California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1085 — School attendance: interdistrict attendance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 87, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the governing boards of 2 or more school districts to enter into an agreement for the interdistrict attendance of pupils who are residents of the school districts. If either school district fails to approve the interdistrict attendance of a pupil, or in the case of the failure or refusal of the school districts to enter into an agreement, existing law authorizes the person having legal custody of the pupil to appeal to the county board of education in accordance with a prescribed procedure. Existing law requires the county board of education to determine, within 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed, whether the pupil should be permitted to attend in the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that school districts and county boards of education use their best efforts to expeditiously process interdistrict attendance appeals. The bill also would require, until July 1, 2015, that, in a class 1 county, which is defined in existing law as a county with 1994–95 average daily attendance of more than 500,000, or a class 2 county, which is defined in existing law as a county with 1994–95 average daily attendance of at least 180,000 but less than 500,000, the county board of education determine whether the pupil should be permitted to attend the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time within 40 schooldays after the appeal is filed rather than 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 87, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.

  4. Enrolled measure version corrected.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 2075.).

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 10. Page 1535.).

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 8).

  10. Referred to Com. on ED.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 6. Page 1170.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13).

  16. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  17. Referred to Com. on ED.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Davis · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Davis

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1085 DAVIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 59 Yea · 15 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0200
Unaffiliated 581306
Democratic 1000
Total 591506
% of votes cast 74%19%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Campos — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1085 Davis By Price

Passed 25 Yea · 10 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 24904
Republican 0100
Democratic 1001
Total 251005
% of votes cast 63%25%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8101
Total 8101
% of votes cast 80%10%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Huff — Yea
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1085 DAVIS Assembly Third Reading

Passed 66 Yea · 6 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 64604
Democratic 2001
Republican 0002
Total 66607
% of votes cast 84%8%0%9%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Cook — Yea
Logue — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Block — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Mendoza — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1085 do?
Existing law authorizes the governing boards of 2 or more school districts to enter into an agreement for the interdistrict attendance of pupils who are residents of the school districts. If either school district fails to approve the interdistrict attendance of a pupil, or in the case of the failure or refusal of the school districts to enter into an agreement, existing law authorizes the person having legal custody of the pupil to appeal to the county board of education in accordance with a prescribed procedure. Existing law requires the county board of education to determine, within 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed, whether the pupil should be permitted to attend in the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that school districts and county boards of education use their best efforts to expeditiously process interdistrict attendance appeals. The bill also would require, until July 1, 2015, that, in a class 1 county, which is defined in existing law as a county with 1994–95 average daily attendance of more than 500,000, or a class 2 county, which is defined in existing law as a county with 1994–95 average daily attendance of at least 180,000 but less than 500,000, the county board of education determine whether the pupil should be permitted to attend the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time within 40 schooldays after the appeal is filed rather than 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed.
Who sponsors AB 1085?
AB 1085 is sponsored by Davis.
What is the current status of AB 1085?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1085?
Track AB 1085 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1085

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1085

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →