AB 1105 — High-occupancy toll lanes: roadway markings.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 114, Statutes of 2011.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to conduct, administer, and operate a value pricing high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane program on 2 corridors included in the high-occupancy vehicle lane system in Santa Clara County. This bill would provide that such a HOT lane established on State Highway Route 101 may extend into San Mateo County as far as the high-occupancy vehicle lane in that county existed as of January 1, 2011, subject to agreement of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. Existing law requires revenues generated by a HOT lane corridor to be available to VTA for direct expenses related to the operation, maintenance, construction, and administration of the corridor, with any remaining revenues to be used in the corridor where generated exclusively for preconstruction, construction, and other related costs of high-occupancy vehicle facilities and improvement of transit service, including support for transit operations. This bill would require the remaining revenues generated by a HOT lane corridor that extends into San Mateo County to be shared for eligible purposes by the 2 counties pursuant to an agreement between VTA and the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. (2) Existing law prohibits a person from driving a vehicle to the left of double parallel solid lines, except in certain situations, including when turning to the left at an intersection or into or out of a driveway or private road. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would limit the above prohibition to double parallel solid yellow lines. The bill would prohibit a person driving a vehicle from crossing over any part of double parallel solid white lines except in the above situations or when entering or exiting designated areas of exclusive or preferential use lanes, as provided. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/25/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 25, 2011
- Enrolled 07/06/11 - Enrolled pdf July 06, 2011
- Amended 04/13/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2011
- Amended 03/31/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 31, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1105 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 114, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:45 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1689.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 1352.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gordon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gordon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 70 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1105 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to conduct, administer, and operate a value pricing high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane program on 2 corridors included in the high-occupancy vehicle lane system in Santa Clara County. This bill would provide that such a HOT lane established on State Highway Route 101 may extend into San Mateo County as far as the high-occupancy vehicle lane in that county existed as of January 1, 2011, subject to agreement of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. Existing law requires revenues generated by a HOT lane corridor to be available to VTA for direct expenses related to the operation, maintenance, construction, and administration of the corridor, with any remaining revenues to be used in the corridor where generated exclusively for preconstruction, construction, and other related costs of high-occupancy vehicle facilities and improvement of transit service, including support for transit operations. This bill would require the remaining revenues generated by a HOT lane corridor that extends into San Mateo County to be shared for eligible purposes by the 2 counties pursuant to an agreement between VTA and the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. (2) Existing law prohibits a person from driving a vehicle to the left of double parallel solid lines, except in certain situations, including when turning to the left at an intersection or into or out of a driveway or private road. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would limit the above prohibition to double parallel solid yellow lines. The bill would prohibit a person driving a vehicle from crossing over any part of double parallel solid white lines except in the above situations or when entering or exiting designated areas of exclusive or preferential use lanes, as provided. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1105?
- AB 1105 is sponsored by Gordon.
- What is the current status of AB 1105?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1105?
- Track AB 1105 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1105
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1105
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →