California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 1 D cosponsors

AB 2382 — Department of Transportation: Innovative Delivery Team Demonstration Program.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law creates the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority with various transportation responsibilities in the County of Santa Clara. This bill would, by July 1, 2013, require the department and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority to enter into a memorandum of understanding to implement the Innovative Delivery Team Demonstration Program, which would, until January 1, 2020, provide a different business model for the application of advanced technologies with the goal of delivering transportation projects and services in the County of Santa Clara in a more responsive, cost-effective, and efficient manner. The bill would require the demonstration program to serve as a mechanism for testing innovative approaches for improving project delivery and local assistance. The bill would require the department to assign specified personnel to the demonstration program. The bill would also require the authority to provide space, equipment, and other resources, as specified, to the demonstration program. The bill would require the authority to carry out, for purposes of implementing the demonstration program, specified responsibilities for state highway projects in the County of Santa Clara. The bill would require the authority to manage the local assistance process, for purposes of implementing the demonstration program, in the County of Santa Clara. The bill would require the demonstration program to adhere to all applicable federal rules and regulations, as specified. The bill would require the authority, in consultation with the department, to evaluate the effectiveness of the demonstration program and to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2015, and by July 1, 2018, on specified matters. By requiring the authority to participate in this demonstration program, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also declare the intent of the Legislature in this regard. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  3. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  6. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  7. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 10. Page 4918.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 2.) (May 9).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  15. Read first time.

  16. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  17. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Alquist · Cosponsor
  • Beall · Cosponsor
  • Blakeslee · Cosponsor
  • Campos · Cosponsor
  • Gordon · Primary
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Simitian · Cosponsor
  • Mike Fong · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Gordon

Co-sponsors (8)

  • Alejo
  • Alquist
  • Beall
  • Blakeslee
  • Campos
  • Hill
  • Simitian
  • Fong, Mike Democratic

Not signed on (113)

113 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 113 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Lieu — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2382 GORDON Assembly Third Reading

Passed 63 Yea · 10 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0101
Unaffiliated 62906
Democratic 1000
Total 631007
% of votes cast 79%13%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Allen — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Jeffries — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Perea — Not Voting
Valadao — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 15 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14200
Democratic 1000
Total 15200
% of votes cast 88%12%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Norby — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10103
Total 10103
% of votes cast 71%7%0%21%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Norby — Nay
Achadjian — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Miller — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2382 do?
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law creates the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority with various transportation responsibilities in the County of Santa Clara. This bill would, by July 1, 2013, require the department and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority to enter into a memorandum of understanding to implement the Innovative Delivery Team Demonstration Program, which would, until January 1, 2020, provide a different business model for the application of advanced technologies with the goal of delivering transportation projects and services in the County of Santa Clara in a more responsive, cost-effective, and efficient manner. The bill would require the demonstration program to serve as a mechanism for testing innovative approaches for improving project delivery and local assistance. The bill would require the department to assign specified personnel to the demonstration program. The bill would also require the authority to provide space, equipment, and other resources, as specified, to the demonstration program. The bill would require the authority to carry out, for purposes of implementing the demonstration program, specified responsibilities for state highway projects in the County of Santa Clara. The bill would require the authority to manage the local assistance process, for purposes of implementing the demonstration program, in the County of Santa Clara. The bill would require the demonstration program to adhere to all applicable federal rules and regulations, as specified. The bill would require the authority, in consultation with the department, to evaluate the effectiveness of the demonstration program and to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2015, and by July 1, 2018, on specified matters. By requiring the authority to participate in this demonstration program, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also declare the intent of the Legislature in this regard. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 2382?
AB 2382 is sponsored by Alejo, Alquist, Beall, Blakeslee, Campos, Gordon, Hill, Simitian, and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2382?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2382?
Track AB 2382 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2382

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2382

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →