California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 309 — Child day care facilities: schoolage child care centers: nonminor students.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 470, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, administered by the State Department of Social Services, provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities, as defined. Willful or repeated violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. The act defines a child as a person who is under 18 years of age who is being provided care and supervision in a child day care facility, with specified exceptions. Under existing law, a child day care facility is authorized to provide nonmedical care to children under 18 years of age in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual on less than a 24-hour basis. Existing law provides for educational programs for persons with exceptional needs. Existing law includes within the definition of an individual with special needs a person between 19 and 21 years of age, who is enrolled in or eligible for a special education program prior to his or her 19th birthday, and who has not yet completed his or her prescribed course of study, has not met proficiency standards, or has not graduated from high school with a regular high school diploma. Existing law provides that a person who becomes 22 years of age during the months of January to June, inclusive, while participating in one of these special education programs, as specified, may continue his or her participation in the program for the remainder of the current fiscal year, including any extended school year program for individuals with exceptional needs established pursuant to specified state and federal law. This bill would authorize the department to approve or deny a written request from a schoolage child care center, as defined, for enrollment or retention of a nonminor student, as defined, at the schoolage child care center if the department makes a specified determination. This bill would require that, if a request is submitted to the department at least 30 days prior to the child's 18th birthday, the nonminor student be retained at a schoolage child care center, unless the request is denied in writing. This bill would prohibit a nonminor student from being enrolled at a schoolage child care center until the request is approved in writing by the department. By changing the definition of an existing crime with respect to the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 470, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:45 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 2240.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2738.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Page 2638.)

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From consent calendar.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  12. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  15. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1184.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  20. Set for hearing May 23.

  21. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Hearing postponed by committee.

  23. Set for hearing May 2.

  24. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 641.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  26. Set for hearing April 12.

  27. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  28. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  29. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Liu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Liu

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB309 Liu Concurrence

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Yea
Huff — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Runner — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Anderson — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 309 Liu Senate Third Reading By PORTANTINO

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 76001
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Campos — Yea
Feuer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Carter — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Allen — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Yea
Davis — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cook — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 309 do?
Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, administered by the State Department of Social Services, provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities, as defined. Willful or repeated violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. The act defines a child as a person who is under 18 years of age who is being provided care and supervision in a child day care facility, with specified exceptions. Under existing law, a child day care facility is authorized to provide nonmedical care to children under 18 years of age in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual on less than a 24-hour basis. Existing law provides for educational programs for persons with exceptional needs. Existing law includes within the definition of an individual with special needs a person between 19 and 21 years of age, who is enrolled in or eligible for a special education program prior to his or her 19th birthday, and who has not yet completed his or her prescribed course of study, has not met proficiency standards, or has not graduated from high school with a regular high school diploma. Existing law provides that a person who becomes 22 years of age during the months of January to June, inclusive, while participating in one of these special education programs, as specified, may continue his or her participation in the program for the remainder of the current fiscal year, including any extended school year program for individuals with exceptional needs established pursuant to specified state and federal law. This bill would authorize the department to approve or deny a written request from a schoolage child care center, as defined, for enrollment or retention of a nonminor student, as defined, at the schoolage child care center if the department makes a specified determination. This bill would require that, if a request is submitted to the department at least 30 days prior to the child's 18th birthday, the nonminor student be retained at a schoolage child care center, unless the request is denied in writing. This bill would prohibit a nonminor student from being enrolled at a schoolage child care center until the request is approved in writing by the department. By changing the definition of an existing crime with respect to the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 309?
SB 309 is sponsored by Liu.
What is the current status of SB 309?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 309?
Track SB 309 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 309

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 309

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →