California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 4 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 292 — California Environmental Quality Act: administrative and judicial review procedures: City of Los Angeles: stadium.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 353, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 30 sponsors

    1 primary, 29 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (4 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 11 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project and judicial review procedures for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would establish specified administrative and judicial review procedures for the administrative and judicial review of the EIR and approvals granted for a project related to the development of a specified stadium in the City of Los Angeles. Because the lead agency would be required to use these alternative procedures for administrative review of the EIR if the project applicant so chooses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the lead agency and applicant to implement specified measures, as a condition of approval of the project, to minimize traffic congestion and air quality impacts that may result from spectators driving to the stadium. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the development of a stadium in the City of Los Angeles.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 353, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:30 a.m.

  4. (Enrolled measure version corrected.)

  5. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 2443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  6. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2433.)

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2382.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 13. Page 2982.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. (Corrected September 9).

  12. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (September 6).

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (September 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 2885.)

  16. Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  17. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 43. Noes 28. Page 2862.)

  19. Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 2806.)

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 25).

  23. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  27. Hearing postponed by committee.

  28. Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  29. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  30. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1140.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  31. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  32. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  33. Set for hearing May 16.

  34. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 850.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  35. Set for hearing May 4.

  36. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  37. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  38. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  39. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  40. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 29 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (29)

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB292 Padilla Concurrence

Passed 32 Yea · 7 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29701
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 32701
% of votes cast 80%18%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Nay
Wyland — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Nay
Evans — Nay
Leno — Nay
Vargas — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Nay
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 292 Padilla Senate Third Reading By PÉREZ, J.

Passed 63 Yea · 13 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1100
Unaffiliated 611204
Democratic 1000
Total 631304
% of votes cast 79%16%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Atkins — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Hill — Nay
Huffman — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Yamada — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10105
Democratic 1000
Total 11105
% of votes cast 65%6%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Solorio — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 292 Padilla Senate Third Reading Amend By LARA Set #1

Passed 43 Yea · 28 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 422609
Democratic 1000
Republican 0200
Total 432809
% of votes cast 54%35%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Atkins — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Huffman — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 292 Padilla Senate Third Reading Motion to Suspend the Rules

Passed 49 Yea · 26 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482405
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 492605
% of votes cast 61%33%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Perea — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Beall — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Torres — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Not Voting
Fletcher — Nay
Bonilla — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Not Voting
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11005
Democratic 1000
Total 12005
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Lara — Yea
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Vargas — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

environment transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 292 do?
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project and judicial review procedures for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would establish specified administrative and judicial review procedures for the administrative and judicial review of the EIR and approvals granted for a project related to the development of a specified stadium in the City of Los Angeles. Because the lead agency would be required to use these alternative procedures for administrative review of the EIR if the project applicant so chooses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the lead agency and applicant to implement specified measures, as a condition of approval of the project, to minimize traffic congestion and air quality impacts that may result from spectators driving to the stadium. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the development of a stadium in the City of Los Angeles.
Who sponsors SB 292?
SB 292 is sponsored by Alejo, Blumenfield, Bradford, Butler, Campos, Calderon, Runner, Mitchell, Cedillo, Correa, Dutton, Feuer, Lara, Pan, Pavley, Price, Smyth, Wright, Wyland, Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic), Allen, Benjamin (Democratic), Rubio, Susan (Democratic), Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic), Strickland, Tony (Republican), Bonnie Lowenthal, Roger Hernández, Beth Gaines, and Bill Berryhill.
What is the current status of SB 292?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 292?
Track SB 292 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 292

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 292

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →