California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 930 — In-home supportive services: enrollment and fingerprinting requirements.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 649, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires a county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium, as applicable, to conduct an investigation of the qualifications and background of an IHSS provider applicant, including specified criminal background checks. This bill would require the county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send the State Department of Social Services a copy of the state-level criminal offender record information search response that is provided to that entity by the Department of Justice for any individual who has requested an appeal of a denial of placement on the registry of IHSS personnel or denial of eligibility to provide supportive services to an IHSS recipient. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program, are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with the county welfare departments, is required to develop protocols and procedures for obtaining fingerprint images of all individuals who are being assessed or reassessed to receive supportive services, as specified. Existing law also requires the standardized time provider timesheet used to track the work performed by providers of in-home supportive services to contain specified information, including, effective July 1, 2011, designated spaces for the index fingerprints of the provider and recipient. This bill would delete the requirements pertaining to obtaining fingerprint images of IHSS recipients, and the requirement that the provider timesheet include spaces for provider and recipient fingerprints. Existing law requires an IHSS provider enrollment form to be completed using the provider's physical residence address, and prohibits the use of a post office box address. Existing law also prohibits a county from mailing a provider's paycheck to a post office box address, unless the county approves a provider request to do so, as specified. This bill would delete these requirements, and the prohibitions relating to the use of a post office box address by an IHSS provider.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 649, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 2237.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 2694.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (August 25).

  9. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  10. Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 1034.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 930.) (May 9).

  18. Set for hearing May 9.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 764.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Set for hearing April 26.

  21. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  22. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Beall · Cosponsor
  • Evans · Primary
  • Yamada · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Beall
  • Yamada

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB930 Evans Concurrence

Passed 23 Yea · 15 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211402
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231502
% of votes cast 58%38%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Runner — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Cannella — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 930 Evans Senate Third Reading By YAMADA

Passed 51 Yea · 27 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0200
Unaffiliated 502502
Democratic 1000
Total 512702
% of votes cast 64%34%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Davis — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10600
Democratic 1000
Total 11600
% of votes cast 65%35%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 23 Yea · 16 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211501
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231601
% of votes cast 58%40%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Runner — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 930 do?
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires a county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium, as applicable, to conduct an investigation of the qualifications and background of an IHSS provider applicant, including specified criminal background checks. This bill would require the county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send the State Department of Social Services a copy of the state-level criminal offender record information search response that is provided to that entity by the Department of Justice for any individual who has requested an appeal of a denial of placement on the registry of IHSS personnel or denial of eligibility to provide supportive services to an IHSS recipient. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program, are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with the county welfare departments, is required to develop protocols and procedures for obtaining fingerprint images of all individuals who are being assessed or reassessed to receive supportive services, as specified. Existing law also requires the standardized time provider timesheet used to track the work performed by providers of in-home supportive services to contain specified information, including, effective July 1, 2011, designated spaces for the index fingerprints of the provider and recipient. This bill would delete the requirements pertaining to obtaining fingerprint images of IHSS recipients, and the requirement that the provider timesheet include spaces for provider and recipient fingerprints. Existing law requires an IHSS provider enrollment form to be completed using the provider's physical residence address, and prohibits the use of a post office box address. Existing law also prohibits a county from mailing a provider's paycheck to a post office box address, unless the county approves a provider request to do so, as specified. This bill would delete these requirements, and the prohibitions relating to the use of a post office box address by an IHSS provider.
Who sponsors SB 930?
SB 930 is sponsored by Beall, Evans, and Yamada.
What is the current status of SB 930?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 930?
Track SB 930 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 930

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 930

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →