Workforce development: training services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1115 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1115.
You're tracking AB 1115
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1115 — Workforce development: training services.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 provides for workforce investment activities, including activities in which states may participate. Existing law, the California Workforce Investment Act, establishes the California Workforce Investment Board, which is the body responsible for assisting the Governor in the development, oversight, and continuous improvement of California's workforce investment system, and prescribes the functions and duties of the board with regard to the implementation and administration of workforce training and development programs. This bill would authorize individuals who are eligible to receive training services under federal law to have the opportunity to select any of the eligible training providers from any of the local areas in the state. The bill would require the California Workforce Investment Board to establish a procedure for use by local workforce investment boards in determining the eligibility of a provider of training services, as prescribed, in accordance with various requirements.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/05/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf July 05, 2011
- Amended 06/22/11 - Amended Senate pdf June 22, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1115 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 25. Page 1660.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lara · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lara
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 52 | 25 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 31% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1115 do?
- The federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 provides for workforce investment activities, including activities in which states may participate. Existing law, the California Workforce Investment Act, establishes the California Workforce Investment Board, which is the body responsible for assisting the Governor in the development, oversight, and continuous improvement of California's workforce investment system, and prescribes the functions and duties of the board with regard to the implementation and administration of workforce training and development programs. This bill would authorize individuals who are eligible to receive training services under federal law to have the opportunity to select any of the eligible training providers from any of the local areas in the state. The bill would require the California Workforce Investment Board to establish a procedure for use by local workforce investment boards in determining the eligibility of a provider of training services, as prescribed, in accordance with various requirements.
- Who sponsors AB 1115?
- AB 1115 is sponsored by Lara.
- What is the current status of AB 1115?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1115?
- Track AB 1115 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1115
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1115
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →