California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 536 — Property tax revenue allocations: public utilities: qualified property: City of Oakley.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 710, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The California Constitution requires the State Board of Equalization to assess the property, other than franchises, of companies transmitting or selling gas or electricity. Existing property tax law provides for the valuation, as a unit, of properties of a state assessee that are operated as a unit as a primary function of that assessee, and for the allocation of the assessed value of the unit among various counties in which the state assessee's unitary property is located. Existing law also provides, pursuant to specified formulas, for the application in each county of specified tax rates to unitary assessed value, and for the allocation among jurisdictions in that county of the resulting revenues. This bill would, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, require that a specified amount of property tax revenues derived from applying a specified tax rate to qualified property, as defined, be allocated first to the county in which the qualified property is located and to all of the school entities located in that county, 2nd to the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District, with the balance allocated to the City of Oakley. This bill would also require that a specified amount of property tax revenues derived from applying another specified tax rate to the qualified property be first allocated to taxing jurisdictions in those tax rate areas in the county in which the qualified property is located, with the balance allocated to taxing jurisdictions pursuant to a specified formula. The bill would require the City of Oakley to reimburse the county auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the county auditor in administering these allocations. The bill would also require the City of Oakley to develop one new housing unit for each 40 jobs created on real property within a specified area, as prescribed. By establishing new duties upon local county officials with respect to the annual allocation of property tax revenues derived from state‑assessed property, and by establishing new duties upon the City of Oakley with respect to the development of affordable housing, this bill would create a state‑mandated local program. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 710, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 6. Page 2468.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 15. Page 3017.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2817.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (August 17).

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  13. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1031.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 846.) (May 2).

  18. Set for hearing May 2.

  19. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 559.) (April 6).

  21. Set for hearing April 6.

  22. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  23. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  24. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Buchanan · Cosponsor
  • DeSaulnier · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Buchanan

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB536 DeSaulnier Urgency Clause Concurrence

Passed 29 Yea · 6 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27505
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 29605
% of votes cast 73%15%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Runner — Nay
Harman — Nay
Leno — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Simitian — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 536 DeSaulnier Third Reading Urgency By BUCHANAN

Passed 62 Yea · 15 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 601403
Republican 1100
Democratic 1000
Total 621503
% of votes cast 78%19%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Huber — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Beall — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Cook — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Logue — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Silva — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Conway — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 536 DeSaulnier Third Reading Urgency By BUCHANAN Amend By BUCHANAN Set #1

Passed 74 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71006
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 74006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hill — Yea
Logue — Yea
Butler — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cook — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Conway — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Garrick — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15100
Democratic 1000
Total 16100
% of votes cast 94%6%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading (Urgency Clause)

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Runner — Yea
De León — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 536 do?
(1) The California Constitution requires the State Board of Equalization to assess the property, other than franchises, of companies transmitting or selling gas or electricity. Existing property tax law provides for the valuation, as a unit, of properties of a state assessee that are operated as a unit as a primary function of that assessee, and for the allocation of the assessed value of the unit among various counties in which the state assessee's unitary property is located. Existing law also provides, pursuant to specified formulas, for the application in each county of specified tax rates to unitary assessed value, and for the allocation among jurisdictions in that county of the resulting revenues. This bill would, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, require that a specified amount of property tax revenues derived from applying a specified tax rate to qualified property, as defined, be allocated first to the county in which the qualified property is located and to all of the school entities located in that county, 2nd to the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District, with the balance allocated to the City of Oakley. This bill would also require that a specified amount of property tax revenues derived from applying another specified tax rate to the qualified property be first allocated to taxing jurisdictions in those tax rate areas in the county in which the qualified property is located, with the balance allocated to taxing jurisdictions pursuant to a specified formula. The bill would require the City of Oakley to reimburse the county auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the county auditor in administering these allocations. The bill would also require the City of Oakley to develop one new housing unit for each 40 jobs created on real property within a specified area, as prescribed. By establishing new duties upon local county officials with respect to the annual allocation of property tax revenues derived from state‑assessed property, and by establishing new duties upon the City of Oakley with respect to the development of affordable housing, this bill would create a state‑mandated local program. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 536?
SB 536 is sponsored by Buchanan and DeSaulnier.
What is the current status of SB 536?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 536?
Track SB 536 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 536

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 536

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →