California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1014 — Public social services: alcohol and drug programs.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 36, Statutes of 2012.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. This bill would, among other things, provide that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. It would also provide that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. The bill would, operative July 1, 2012, delete the county plan and negotiated net amount contract requirements and instead require counties that apply for funds to submit to the department a contract for federal funding from the state to provide alcohol and other drug prevention, treatment, and recovery services. It would declare that the state has an interest in a specified women and children's residential treatment services program, funded by federal grants, and state the Legislature's intent for the department to work with counties under the 2011 realignment to develop reporting requirements. The bill would generally remove references to state involvement and funding in reference to alcohol and drug abuse prevention, treatment, and recovery services in a county. The bill would authorize counties to establish drug courts subject to certain requirements and state oversight. This bill would also revise provisions pertaining to apportionment of penalties among counties. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal Drug Treatment Program (Drug Medi-Cal) , under which counties enter into contracts with a department within the California Health and Human Services Agency for the provision of various drug treatment services to Medi-Cal recipients, or the department directly arranges for the provision of these services if a county elects not to do so. Existing law requires, commencing July 1, 2012, that the administrative functions of the Drug Medi-Cal Program performed by the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs be transferred to the State Department of Health Care Services in accordance with an administrative and programmatic transition plan. This bill would, operative July 1, 2012, make various changes to the statutory provisions regulating the Drug Medi-Cal program to conform these provisions to the above-described transfer requirement. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 36, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 4143.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 5467.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Withdrawn from committee.

  9. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Page 5412.)

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  11. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 2977.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. Ordered to second reading.

  16. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2916.)

  17. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  19. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 1014 B. & F. R. Senate Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 51 Yea · 27 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502502
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 512702
% of votes cast 64%34%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Conway — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Not Voting
Cook — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Butler — Yea
Campos — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Unfinished Supp 1 SB1014 Committee on B. & F.R.

Passed 25 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231301
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 251401
% of votes cast 63%35%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB1014 Committee on B. & F.R.

Passed 23 Yea · 10 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211006
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 231007
% of votes cast 58%25%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Huff — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Not Voting
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1014 do?
Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. This bill would, among other things, provide that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. It would also provide that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. The bill would, operative July 1, 2012, delete the county plan and negotiated net amount contract requirements and instead require counties that apply for funds to submit to the department a contract for federal funding from the state to provide alcohol and other drug prevention, treatment, and recovery services. It would declare that the state has an interest in a specified women and children's residential treatment services program, funded by federal grants, and state the Legislature's intent for the department to work with counties under the 2011 realignment to develop reporting requirements. The bill would generally remove references to state involvement and funding in reference to alcohol and drug abuse prevention, treatment, and recovery services in a county. The bill would authorize counties to establish drug courts subject to certain requirements and state oversight. This bill would also revise provisions pertaining to apportionment of penalties among counties. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal Drug Treatment Program (Drug Medi-Cal) , under which counties enter into contracts with a department within the California Health and Human Services Agency for the provision of various drug treatment services to Medi-Cal recipients, or the department directly arranges for the provision of these services if a county elects not to do so. Existing law requires, commencing July 1, 2012, that the administrative functions of the Drug Medi-Cal Program performed by the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs be transferred to the State Department of Health Care Services in accordance with an administrative and programmatic transition plan. This bill would, operative July 1, 2012, make various changes to the statutory provisions regulating the Drug Medi-Cal program to conform these provisions to the above-described transfer requirement. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 1014?
SB 1014 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 1014?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1014?
Track SB 1014 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1014

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1014

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →