Common interest developments: electric vehicle charging stations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 209 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 209.
You're tracking SB 209
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 209 — Common interest developments: electric vehicle charging stations.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 121, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. This bill would provide that any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of any interest in a common interest development, or any provision of the governing documents of a common interest development, that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of an electrical vehicle charging station is void and unenforceable. The bill would authorize an association, as defined, to impose reasonable restrictions on those stations, as specified, and would impose requirements with respect to an association's approval process for those stations. If the station is to be placed in a common interest area or an exclusive use common area, the homeowner would be responsible for various costs associated with maintaining and repairing the station, as well as costs for damage to common areas and adjacent units resulting from installation and maintenance of the station. The bill would impose other responsibilities on the homeowner, including maintaining an umbrella liability coverage policy of $1,000,000 that names the common interest development as an additional insured. An association that violates the bill's provisions would be liable for damages and a civil penalty, as specified.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/25/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 25, 2011
- Enrolled 07/08/11 - Enrolled pdf July 08, 2011
- Amended 06/06/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 06, 2011
- Amended 04/05/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2011
- Amended 03/22/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 22, 2011
- Introduced 02/08/11 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2011
- SB209 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 121, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 1749.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 19. Page 2188.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 21).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 702.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 495.) (March 29).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 11.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Corbett · Primary
- Kehoe · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kehoe
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 35% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 18 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 55 | 19 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 24% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 35% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 209 do?
- The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. This bill would provide that any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of any interest in a common interest development, or any provision of the governing documents of a common interest development, that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of an electrical vehicle charging station is void and unenforceable. The bill would authorize an association, as defined, to impose reasonable restrictions on those stations, as specified, and would impose requirements with respect to an association's approval process for those stations. If the station is to be placed in a common interest area or an exclusive use common area, the homeowner would be responsible for various costs associated with maintaining and repairing the station, as well as costs for damage to common areas and adjacent units resulting from installation and maintenance of the station. The bill would impose other responsibilities on the homeowner, including maintaining an umbrella liability coverage policy of $1,000,000 that names the common interest development as an additional insured. An association that violates the bill's provisions would be liable for damages and a civil penalty, as specified.
- Who sponsors SB 209?
- SB 209 is sponsored by Corbett and Kehoe.
- What is the current status of SB 209?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 209?
- Track SB 209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →