Insurance: surplus line brokers: statement of business transacted.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 131 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 131.
You're tracking SB 131
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 131 — Insurance: surplus line brokers: statement of business transacted.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 302, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires, on or before the first day of March of each year, the surplus line broker to file with the Insurance Commissioner a sworn statement of all business transacted under his or her surplus line license during the last preceding calendar year. "Business done" or "business transacted" under a surplus line broker's license means all insurance regarding which that surplus line broker is required to file a confidential written report with the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, as provided. Existing law further provides that if 2 or more persons licensed as surplus line brokers are involved in placing an insurance policy, only the one responsible for negotiating, effecting the placement, remitting the premium to the nonadmitted insurer to its representatives, and filing the confidential written report is considered transacting under his or her surplus line broker's license. This bill would specify that the sworn statement filing requirements apply to surplus line brokers placing business for a home state insured. The bill would require that the information in the sworn statement be expanded to include the total amount of gross premium, the total gross premium for single state risks where 100% of the premium is attributable to risks in California, and for multistate risks, the percentage of gross premium allocated to California and each other state. The bill would require that the sworn statement filing also apply to a home state insured that directly procures insurance with a nonadmitted insurer. The bill would authorize the commissioner to waive or modify any of the foregoing requirements by public notice published on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would change the definition of "business done" or "business transacted" to mean all insurance business conducted by a surplus line broker for a home state insured or directly procured by the home state insured. The bill would require that when 2 or more licensed surplus line brokers are involved in placing a policy, only the one responsible for filing the confidential written report, as specified, would be considered transacting business for tax purposes, and only one licensed surplus broker would be required to include the policy in his or her sworn statement. The surplus line broker required to include the policy in his or her sworn statement would be either the one responsible for negotiating, effecting the placement, remitting the premium to the nonadmitted insurer or its representatives, and filing the confidential written report, or the one surplus line broker delegated the responsibility for the filing of the confidential written report pursuant to a written agreement, as provided.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/11 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2011
- Enrolled 09/01/11 - Enrolled pdf September 01, 2011
- Amended 06/28/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 28, 2011
- Amended 05/17/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 17, 2011
- Amended 05/03/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 03, 2011
- Amended 04/13/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2011
- Introduced 01/27/11 - Introduced pdf January 27, 2011
- SB131 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 302, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2153.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2595.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 22).
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1139.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 11).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Calderon · Cosponsor
- Beth Gaines · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
- Calderon
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 131 do?
- Existing law requires, on or before the first day of March of each year, the surplus line broker to file with the Insurance Commissioner a sworn statement of all business transacted under his or her surplus line license during the last preceding calendar year. "Business done" or "business transacted" under a surplus line broker's license means all insurance regarding which that surplus line broker is required to file a confidential written report with the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, as provided. Existing law further provides that if 2 or more persons licensed as surplus line brokers are involved in placing an insurance policy, only the one responsible for negotiating, effecting the placement, remitting the premium to the nonadmitted insurer to its representatives, and filing the confidential written report is considered transacting under his or her surplus line broker's license. This bill would specify that the sworn statement filing requirements apply to surplus line brokers placing business for a home state insured. The bill would require that the information in the sworn statement be expanded to include the total amount of gross premium, the total gross premium for single state risks where 100% of the premium is attributable to risks in California, and for multistate risks, the percentage of gross premium allocated to California and each other state. The bill would require that the sworn statement filing also apply to a home state insured that directly procures insurance with a nonadmitted insurer. The bill would authorize the commissioner to waive or modify any of the foregoing requirements by public notice published on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would change the definition of "business done" or "business transacted" to mean all insurance business conducted by a surplus line broker for a home state insured or directly procured by the home state insured. The bill would require that when 2 or more licensed surplus line brokers are involved in placing a policy, only the one responsible for filing the confidential written report, as specified, would be considered transacting business for tax purposes, and only one licensed surplus broker would be required to include the policy in his or her sworn statement. The surplus line broker required to include the policy in his or her sworn statement would be either the one responsible for negotiating, effecting the placement, remitting the premium to the nonadmitted insurer or its representatives, and filing the confidential written report, or the one surplus line broker delegated the responsibility for the filing of the confidential written report pursuant to a written agreement, as provided.
- Who sponsors SB 131?
- SB 131 is sponsored by Calderon and Beth Gaines.
- What is the current status of SB 131?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 131?
- Track SB 131 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 131
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 131
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →