SB 446 — Ontario International Airport.
Last action — Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for creation of airport districts. Existing law provides for transfer of the San Diego International Airport from the San Diego Unified Port District to the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. This bill would establish the Ontario International Airport Authority as a local entity of regional government. The bill would establish the membership of the board of directors of the authority and set forth the powers of the authority. The bill would authorize the authority to enter into an agreement with the City of Los Angeles to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would require the authority, in cooperation with the City of Los Angeles and the City of Ontario, to develop a transition plan to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would also require the authority, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Ontario, the County of San Bernardino, other local and regional agencies, and the Department of Transportation to cooperate to develop effective surface transportation access to the Ontario International Airport. To the extent these provisions would impose additional duties on entities of local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/23/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 23, 2011
- Amended 06/09/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 09, 2011
- Amended 05/10/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 10, 2011
- Amended 04/07/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 07, 2011
- Introduced 02/16/11 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2011
- SB446 View text html
Action History
-
Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 1185.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 864.) (May 3).
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Negrete McLeod · Cosponsor
- Carter · Cosponsor
- Donnelly · Cosponsor
- Dutton · Primary
- Hagman · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Knight · Cosponsor
- Morrell · Cosponsor
- Nestande · Cosponsor
- Torres · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dutton
Co-sponsors (10)
- Negrete McLeod
- Carter
- Donnelly
- Hagman
- Huff
- Jeffries
- Knight
- Morrell
- Nestande
- Torres
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 3% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 446 do?
- Existing law provides for creation of airport districts. Existing law provides for transfer of the San Diego International Airport from the San Diego Unified Port District to the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. This bill would establish the Ontario International Airport Authority as a local entity of regional government. The bill would establish the membership of the board of directors of the authority and set forth the powers of the authority. The bill would authorize the authority to enter into an agreement with the City of Los Angeles to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would require the authority, in cooperation with the City of Los Angeles and the City of Ontario, to develop a transition plan to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would also require the authority, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Ontario, the County of San Bernardino, other local and regional agencies, and the Department of Transportation to cooperate to develop effective surface transportation access to the Ontario International Airport. To the extent these provisions would impose additional duties on entities of local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 446?
- SB 446 is sponsored by Negrete McLeod, Carter, Donnelly, Dutton, Hagman, Huff, Jeffries, Knight, Morrell, Nestande, and Torres.
- What is the current status of SB 446?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 446?
- Track SB 446 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 446
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 446
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →