California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 96 — Keeping Adults Free from Institutions program.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care (ADHC) be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to create the Keeping Adults Free from Institutions (KAFI) program, which shall be a new program to provide services in the community that are designed to prevent institutionalization, and that the KAFI program be established as quickly as possible to minimize any disruption in services resulting from the elimination of ADHC as a Medi-Cal benefit. This bill would prohibit the KAFI program from being implemented until federal approval is obtained, and provide that the KAFI program is to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. This bill would require the department to submit, on or before September 1, 2011, an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the KAFI program. This bill would require the KAFI program to utilize licensed adult day health centers to provide a well-defined scope of specified services for Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have been assessed to be at significant risk of institutionalization. This bill would require the department to consult with interested stakeholders and the Legislature in developing the application to CMS and would authorize the department to implement these provisions by means of a state plan amendment or federal waiver, or combination thereof. This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the department for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:15 p.m.

  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1950.).

  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 1371.).

  6. (Page 1369.)

  7. Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1, Joint Rule 10.5 suspended by unanimous consent.

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  14. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 16).

  16. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. Ordered to second reading.

  21. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  22. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 0. Page 415.)

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Without reference to committee.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 54 Yea · 24 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 532202
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 542402
% of votes cast 68%30%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Campos — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Monning — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Knight — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Miller — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 15 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221401
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241501
% of votes cast 60%38%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Evans — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Total 11500
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Liu — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay · 30 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0002
Unaffiliated 460028
Democratic 3000
Total 490030
% of votes cast 62%0%0%38%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Carter — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Morrell — Not Voting
Achadjian — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 96 do?
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care (ADHC) be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to create the Keeping Adults Free from Institutions (KAFI) program, which shall be a new program to provide services in the community that are designed to prevent institutionalization, and that the KAFI program be established as quickly as possible to minimize any disruption in services resulting from the elimination of ADHC as a Medi-Cal benefit. This bill would prohibit the KAFI program from being implemented until federal approval is obtained, and provide that the KAFI program is to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. This bill would require the department to submit, on or before September 1, 2011, an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the KAFI program. This bill would require the KAFI program to utilize licensed adult day health centers to provide a well-defined scope of specified services for Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have been assessed to be at significant risk of institutionalization. This bill would require the department to consult with interested stakeholders and the Legislature in developing the application to CMS and would authorize the department to implement these provisions by means of a state plan amendment or federal waiver, or combination thereof. This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the department for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 96?
AB 96 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 96?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 96?
Track AB 96 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 96

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 96

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →