AB 96 — Keeping Adults Free from Institutions program.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care (ADHC) be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to create the Keeping Adults Free from Institutions (KAFI) program, which shall be a new program to provide services in the community that are designed to prevent institutionalization, and that the KAFI program be established as quickly as possible to minimize any disruption in services resulting from the elimination of ADHC as a Medi-Cal benefit. This bill would prohibit the KAFI program from being implemented until federal approval is obtained, and provide that the KAFI program is to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. This bill would require the department to submit, on or before September 1, 2011, an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the KAFI program. This bill would require the KAFI program to utilize licensed adult day health centers to provide a well-defined scope of specified services for Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have been assessed to be at significant risk of institutionalization. This bill would require the department to consult with interested stakeholders and the Legislature in developing the application to CMS and would authorize the department to implement these provisions by means of a state plan amendment or federal waiver, or combination thereof. This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the department for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 07/14/11 - Enrolled Current pdf July 14, 2011
- Amended 06/08/11 - Amended Senate pdf June 08, 2011
- Amended 04/06/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2011
- Amended 03/14/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 14, 2011
- Introduced 01/10/11 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2011
- AB96 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:15 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1950.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 1371.).
-
(Page 1369.)
-
Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1, Joint Rule 10.5 suspended by unanimous consent.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 16).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 0. Page 415.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Without reference to committee.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 24 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 30% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 38% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 96 do?
- Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care (ADHC) be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to create the Keeping Adults Free from Institutions (KAFI) program, which shall be a new program to provide services in the community that are designed to prevent institutionalization, and that the KAFI program be established as quickly as possible to minimize any disruption in services resulting from the elimination of ADHC as a Medi-Cal benefit. This bill would prohibit the KAFI program from being implemented until federal approval is obtained, and provide that the KAFI program is to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. This bill would require the department to submit, on or before September 1, 2011, an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the KAFI program. This bill would require the KAFI program to utilize licensed adult day health centers to provide a well-defined scope of specified services for Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have been assessed to be at significant risk of institutionalization. This bill would require the department to consult with interested stakeholders and the Legislature in developing the application to CMS and would authorize the department to implement these provisions by means of a state plan amendment or federal waiver, or combination thereof. This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the department for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors AB 96?
- AB 96 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
- What is the current status of AB 96?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 96?
- Track AB 96 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 96
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 96
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →