SB 907 — Master Plan for Infrastructure Financing and Development Commission.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution regulates the issuance of debt by the state and requires that debt in excess of $300,000 for which the state will be generally obligated be submitted to, and approved by, the voters. This bill would create the Master Plan for Infrastructure Financing and Development Commission, consisting of specified members, and would require the commission to prepare and submit a strategy and plan for infrastructure development in California that meets certain criteria to the Legislature and the Governor by December 1, 2013. This bill would provide that the commission would dissolve 30 days after submission of its final report. This bill would repeal these provisions upon the dissolution of the commission. The bill would provide that these provisions become operative only if the funds required to support the commission are appropriated and made available in the annual Budget Act.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/03/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 03, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 04/11/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 11, 2011
- Amended 03/30/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 30, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB907 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on J., E.D. & E.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 1234.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1123.) (May 26).
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 763.) (April 27).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 6.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Evans · Primary
- Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Evans
Co-sponsors (1)
- Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 907 do?
- The California Constitution regulates the issuance of debt by the state and requires that debt in excess of $300,000 for which the state will be generally obligated be submitted to, and approved by, the voters. This bill would create the Master Plan for Infrastructure Financing and Development Commission, consisting of specified members, and would require the commission to prepare and submit a strategy and plan for infrastructure development in California that meets certain criteria to the Legislature and the Governor by December 1, 2013. This bill would provide that the commission would dissolve 30 days after submission of its final report. This bill would repeal these provisions upon the dissolution of the commission. The bill would provide that these provisions become operative only if the funds required to support the commission are appropriated and made available in the annual Budget Act.
- Who sponsors SB 907?
- SB 907 is sponsored by Evans and Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 907?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 907?
- Track SB 907 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 907
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 907
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →