Nursing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 539 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 539.
You're tracking SB 539
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 539 — Nursing.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 338, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, until January 1, 2012, creates within the Department of Consumer Affairs, the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California. Existing law, until January 1, 2012, requires the board to select an executive officer to perform duties delegated by the board. Under existing law, boards scheduled for repeal are required to be evaluated by the Joint Sunset Review Committee. This bill would extend the operation of those provisions until January 1, 2016, and would specify that the board would be subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. (2) Existing law requires the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California to inspect all schools of vocational nursing and psychiatric technicians for purposes of accreditation or determining compliance with prescribed standards. This bill would instead require the inspection or review of those schools for the purposes described above. (3) Existing law requires an applicant for a vocational nurse license or a psychiatric technician's license to have successfully completed specified courses of studies from a school accredited by the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California. Existing law requires an employer of a licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician to report to the board the suspension or termination for cause of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician. A violation by any person of any of the provisions governing these professions is a misdemeanor. This bill would instead require an applicant for a vocational nurse license or a psychiatric technician's license to have successfully completed specified courses of studies from a school approved by the board. The bill would also require an employer of a licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician to report to the board the resignation for cause, as defined, of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician and would require an employment agency or nursing registry to report to the board the rejection from assignment of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician. By revising the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/26/11 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2011
- Enrolled 09/08/11 - Enrolled pdf September 08, 2011
- Amended 06/09/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 09, 2011
- Amended 05/09/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 09, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- SB539 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 338, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2335.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2778.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1066.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1013.) (May 16).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 848.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Price · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Price
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 73 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 539 do?
- (1) Existing law, until January 1, 2012, creates within the Department of Consumer Affairs, the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California. Existing law, until January 1, 2012, requires the board to select an executive officer to perform duties delegated by the board. Under existing law, boards scheduled for repeal are required to be evaluated by the Joint Sunset Review Committee. This bill would extend the operation of those provisions until January 1, 2016, and would specify that the board would be subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. (2) Existing law requires the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California to inspect all schools of vocational nursing and psychiatric technicians for purposes of accreditation or determining compliance with prescribed standards. This bill would instead require the inspection or review of those schools for the purposes described above. (3) Existing law requires an applicant for a vocational nurse license or a psychiatric technician's license to have successfully completed specified courses of studies from a school accredited by the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California. Existing law requires an employer of a licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician to report to the board the suspension or termination for cause of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician. A violation by any person of any of the provisions governing these professions is a misdemeanor. This bill would instead require an applicant for a vocational nurse license or a psychiatric technician's license to have successfully completed specified courses of studies from a school approved by the board. The bill would also require an employer of a licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician to report to the board the resignation for cause, as defined, of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician and would require an employment agency or nursing registry to report to the board the rejection from assignment of the licensed vocational nurse or psychiatric technician. By revising the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 539?
- SB 539 is sponsored by Price.
- What is the current status of SB 539?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 539?
- Track SB 539 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 539
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 539
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →