California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 835 — Public contracts: University of California: pilot program: best value procedures.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 636, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, until January 1, 2012, establishes the Best Value Construction Contract Pilot Program, which authorizes a single University of California campus located in the City and County of San Francisco to award construction contracts based on the best value procedures, as specified. Existing law requires the Regents of the University of California to adopt and publish procedures and required criteria, as specified, that ensure that all selections are conducted in a fair and impartial manner. Existing law also requires, on or before January 1, 2010, the Regents of the University of California to submit a report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee regarding the pilot program, as specified. Existing law requires bidders to verify specified information under oath. This bill would expand the pilot program described above to apply to all campuses of the University of California, including the medical centers, for projects over $1,000,000. This bill would instead require the Regents of the University of California to adopt and publish procedures and required guidelines for evaluating the qualifications of the bidders to ensure that best value selections by the university are conducted in a fair and impartial manner. This bill would require the Regents of the University of California to submit a report on the pilot program before January 1, 2016. This bill would extend the pilot program until January 1, 2017. This bill would also make conforming changes to related provisions. By extending the requirement that bidders verify specified information under oath, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 636, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 2334.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the measure be returned to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 2261.) (September 1).

  6. Set for hearing September 1.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2123.) Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 23. Page 2631.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (July 13).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.

  15. Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 982.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 930.) (May 9).

  20. Set for hearing May 9.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 761.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Set for hearing April 27.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  25. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  26. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  27. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB835 Wolk Concurrence

Passed 23 Yea · 12 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221104
Republican 0100
Democratic 1001
Total 231205
% of votes cast 58%30%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Yee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Runner — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 835 Wolk Senate Third Reading By MA

Passed 50 Yea · 23 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 492107
Democratic 1000
Republican 0200
Total 502307
% of votes cast 63%29%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Davis — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Campos — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Beall — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9502
Democratic 1000
Total 10502
% of votes cast 59%29%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Norby — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Anderson — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 835 do?
Existing law, until January 1, 2012, establishes the Best Value Construction Contract Pilot Program, which authorizes a single University of California campus located in the City and County of San Francisco to award construction contracts based on the best value procedures, as specified. Existing law requires the Regents of the University of California to adopt and publish procedures and required criteria, as specified, that ensure that all selections are conducted in a fair and impartial manner. Existing law also requires, on or before January 1, 2010, the Regents of the University of California to submit a report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee regarding the pilot program, as specified. Existing law requires bidders to verify specified information under oath. This bill would expand the pilot program described above to apply to all campuses of the University of California, including the medical centers, for projects over $1,000,000. This bill would instead require the Regents of the University of California to adopt and publish procedures and required guidelines for evaluating the qualifications of the bidders to ensure that best value selections by the university are conducted in a fair and impartial manner. This bill would require the Regents of the University of California to submit a report on the pilot program before January 1, 2016. This bill would extend the pilot program until January 1, 2017. This bill would also make conforming changes to related provisions. By extending the requirement that bidders verify specified information under oath, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 835?
SB 835 is sponsored by Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 835?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 835?
Track SB 835 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 835

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 835

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →