Environmental quality: pipelines: project applicants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2564 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2564.
You're tracking AB 2564
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2564 — Environmental quality: pipelines: project applicants.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 487, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA exempts a project of less than one mile in length within a public street or highway or any other public right-of-way for the installation of a new pipeline, as defined, or the maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, relocation, replacement, removal, or demolition of an existing pipeline. Existing law excludes from the definition of pipeline, for purposes of this exemption, certain surface facilities. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, revise that definition of pipeline to delete the exclusion of those surface facilities and to include surface accessories or appurtenances to a pipeline. The bill would require a resource agency, as defined, when determining the applicability of the exemption of pipelines from the act with regard to a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity, as defined, to consider only the length of pipeline that is within its legal jurisdiction. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the exemption of pipelines from the act and upon a local agency that is a resource agency regarding the applicability of the exemption regarding a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, authorize a public agency to establish a process that would allow an applicant for a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity to elect to pay additional fees to be used by the public agency in determining whether to approve that activity by entering into a contract with one or more 3rd parties to assist the public agency to perform the analysis. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2012
- Enrolled 09/11/12 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2012
- Amended 08/31/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 31, 2012
- Amended 08/21/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 21, 2012
- Amended 08/13/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 13, 2012
- Amended 08/07/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 07, 2012
- Amended 06/26/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 26, 2012
- Amended 06/12/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 12, 2012
- Amended 04/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2564 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 487, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 2. Page 6779.).
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 6775.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 5075.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (August 30).
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Page 5029.)
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4895.)
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Joint Rule 61(b)(15) suspended. (Page 4875.)
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6206.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Ma · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ma
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 3% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 10% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 14% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 71 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2564 do?
- (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA exempts a project of less than one mile in length within a public street or highway or any other public right-of-way for the installation of a new pipeline, as defined, or the maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, relocation, replacement, removal, or demolition of an existing pipeline. Existing law excludes from the definition of pipeline, for purposes of this exemption, certain surface facilities. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, revise that definition of pipeline to delete the exclusion of those surface facilities and to include surface accessories or appurtenances to a pipeline. The bill would require a resource agency, as defined, when determining the applicability of the exemption of pipelines from the act with regard to a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity, as defined, to consider only the length of pipeline that is within its legal jurisdiction. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the exemption of pipelines from the act and upon a local agency that is a resource agency regarding the applicability of the exemption regarding a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, authorize a public agency to establish a process that would allow an applicant for a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity to elect to pay additional fees to be used by the public agency in determining whether to approve that activity by entering into a contract with one or more 3rd parties to assist the public agency to perform the analysis. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2564?
- AB 2564 is sponsored by Ma.
- What is the current status of AB 2564?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2564?
- Track AB 2564 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2564
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2564
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →