School districts: emergency apportionments: trustees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2279 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2279.
You're tracking AB 2279
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2279 — School districts: emergency apportionments: trustees.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 429, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to request an emergency apportionment through the Superintendent of Public Instruction if the governing board of the school district determines during a fiscal year that its revenues are less than the amount necessary to meet its current year expenditure obligations. Under existing law, if a school district accepts an emergency apportionment, the Superintendent is required, among other things, to appoint a trustee who has recognized expertise in management and finance, and may employ, on a short-term basis, any staff necessary to assist the trustee. Existing law also requires the trustee and any necessary staff to serve until the emergency apportionment is repaid, the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, and the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable. Existing law authorizes the trustee, during the period of his or her service, to stay or rescind any action of the governing board of the school district that, in the judgment of the trustee, may affect the financial condition of the school district. This bill would instead require the trustee and necessary staff to serve until the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable, and the Superintendent decides to terminate the trustee's appointment, but in no event, for less than 3 years. The bill would authorize the county superintendent of schools who has jurisdiction over the school district, after the trustee's period of service and until the loan is repaid, to stay or rescind an action of the governing board of the school district that, in his or her judgment, may affect the financial condition of the school district. The bill would require the county superintendent of schools to notify the Superintendent, as specified, within 5 business days of staying or rescinding an action of the governing board of the school district. If the Superintendent receives this notice from the county superintendent of schools, the bill would require the Superintendent to report to the Legislature, on or before December 30 of every year, whether the school district is complying with the fiscal plan approved for the school district. Existing law authorizes the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. This bill would instead authorize the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed or the emergency apportionment is repaid, whichever occurs later, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. The bill also would authorize the governing board of a qualifying school district, after one complete fiscal year has elapsed following the qualifying school district's acceptance of an emergency apportionment, to conduct an annual advisory evaluation, as specified, of the administrator appointed by the Superintendent. The bill would require the evaluation criteria to be agreed upon by the governing board of the qualifying school district and the administrator. The bill would require the advisory evaluation of the administrator to be submitted to the Governor, the Legislature, the Superintendent, and the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team. The bill would make numerous nonsubstantive changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 41326 of the Education Code, proposed by AB 2662, to be operative only if AB 2662 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2012
- Enrolled 09/06/12 - Enrolled pdf September 06, 2012
- Amended 08/20/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 20, 2012
- Amended 08/06/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 06, 2012
- Amended 07/02/12 - Amended Senate pdf July 02, 2012
- Amended 05/02/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 02, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2279 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 429, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:10 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 1. Page 6415.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 4749.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 20).
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5033.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 36% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2279 do?
- Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to request an emergency apportionment through the Superintendent of Public Instruction if the governing board of the school district determines during a fiscal year that its revenues are less than the amount necessary to meet its current year expenditure obligations. Under existing law, if a school district accepts an emergency apportionment, the Superintendent is required, among other things, to appoint a trustee who has recognized expertise in management and finance, and may employ, on a short-term basis, any staff necessary to assist the trustee. Existing law also requires the trustee and any necessary staff to serve until the emergency apportionment is repaid, the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, and the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable. Existing law authorizes the trustee, during the period of his or her service, to stay or rescind any action of the governing board of the school district that, in the judgment of the trustee, may affect the financial condition of the school district. This bill would instead require the trustee and necessary staff to serve until the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable, and the Superintendent decides to terminate the trustee's appointment, but in no event, for less than 3 years. The bill would authorize the county superintendent of schools who has jurisdiction over the school district, after the trustee's period of service and until the loan is repaid, to stay or rescind an action of the governing board of the school district that, in his or her judgment, may affect the financial condition of the school district. The bill would require the county superintendent of schools to notify the Superintendent, as specified, within 5 business days of staying or rescinding an action of the governing board of the school district. If the Superintendent receives this notice from the county superintendent of schools, the bill would require the Superintendent to report to the Legislature, on or before December 30 of every year, whether the school district is complying with the fiscal plan approved for the school district. Existing law authorizes the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. This bill would instead authorize the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed or the emergency apportionment is repaid, whichever occurs later, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. The bill also would authorize the governing board of a qualifying school district, after one complete fiscal year has elapsed following the qualifying school district's acceptance of an emergency apportionment, to conduct an annual advisory evaluation, as specified, of the administrator appointed by the Superintendent. The bill would require the evaluation criteria to be agreed upon by the governing board of the qualifying school district and the administrator. The bill would require the advisory evaluation of the administrator to be submitted to the Governor, the Legislature, the Superintendent, and the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team. The bill would make numerous nonsubstantive changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 41326 of the Education Code, proposed by AB 2662, to be operative only if AB 2662 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
- Who sponsors AB 2279?
- AB 2279 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 2279?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2279?
- Track AB 2279 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2279
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2279
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →