California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1148 — Fish and Game Commission: Department of Fish and Game.

Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's item veto pending.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Wetlands Mitigation Bank Act of 1993 provides for the establishment of wetlands mitigation bank sites to increase the total wetlands acreage and values within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. This bill would provide that no conservation bank, mitigation bank, or conservation and mitigation bank is operative, vested, or final, nor bank credits issued, until the Department of Fish and Game has approved the bank in writing and a conservation easement has been recorded on the site. The bill would require the department to follow certain procedures and authorize the department to charge and adjust specified fees to cover the reasonable costs of the department reviewing various documents when a person is interested in establishing a bank. The bill would require the department to deposit revenues of those fees in a separate dedicated account within the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. The bill would require the department to establish and maintain a database that includes certain information about banks and to make this data available on its Internet Web site or accessible by a link from the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department to adopt and amend guidelines and criteria to amend provisions relating to the department's review of a bank. (2) Under existing law, the changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for State and Local Government Purchases of Goods and Services is used as the index to determine an annual rate of increase or decrease in the fees for hunting and fishing licenses, stamps, permits, and tags. Under existing law, the department issues lifetime sportsman's licenses, hunting licenses, sport fishing ocean enhancement stamps, commercial fishing ocean enhancement stamps, commercial fishing ocean enhancement validations, commercial fishing licenses, commercial fish business licenses, commercial boat registrations, sport fishing ocean enhancement validations, trapping licenses, and sport fishing licenses, and existing law establishes base fees for those entitlements, adjusted annually pursuant to the index. This bill would require the Fish and Game Commission to adjust the base fees for lifetime sportsman's licenses, hunting licenses, sport fishing ocean enhancement stamps and validations, commercial fishing ocean enhancement stamps and validations, commercial fishing licenses, commercial fish business licenses, commercial boat registrations, trapping licenses, and sport fishing licenses, as necessary, to fully recover, but not exceed, all reasonable administrative and implementation costs of the department and the commission relating to those licenses. The bill would also authorize the department to establish fees and to adjust statutorily imposed fees by regulation for certain filings, permits, determinations, or other department actions. (3) Existing law relating to the Office of Planning and Research requires every officer, agency, department, or instrumentality of state government to cooperate in the preparation and maintenance of the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report and to ensure that their entity's functional plan is consistent with specified state planning priorities and annually demonstrate, when requesting infrastructure as specified, how the plans are consistent with those priorities. Existing law requires those entities to comply with any request for advice, assistance, information, or other material. This bill would specify that the subject entities include certain trustee agencies. (4) Existing law, the Trout and Steelhead Conservation and Management Planning Act of 1979, requires the department to determine whether a stream or lake should be managed as a wild trout fishery, or whether its management should involve the planting of native trout species to supplement wild trout populations. Existing law requires the commission to develop additional wild trout waters. Existing law requires the department to prepare a list each year of no less than 25 miles of stream or stream segments and at least one lake that it deems suitable for consideration as wild trout waters and to submit this list to the commission. Existing law requires the commission to annually submit a report to the Legislature that includes its reasons why any stream or lake listed by the department was or was not included in the program. Existing law requires the department to prepare and complete management plans for all wild trout waters not more than 3 years following their initial designation by the commission, and to update the management plan every 5 years following completion of the initial management plan. This bill would revise the findings and declarations of the act. The bill would require the department to maintain and continuously revise specified inventories prepared for each stream, stream system, or lake, with the goal of reviewing every watershed once per decade, and would require the department to make those inventories publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the commission, instead, to report to the Legislature regarding progress in implementing the wild trout program on even-numbered years and would require the report to be publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department every 5 years to update the Strategic Plan for Trout Management published in November 2003 as necessary to guide the state's trout management. The bill would require the department to prepare and complete trout management plans consistent with the Strategic Plan for Trout Management for all wild trout waters, to be reviewed as prescribed, and to make the Strategic Plan for Trout Management and the trout management plans publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department, by January 1, 2014, to form an intradepartmental strategic trout management team to provide statewide direction and trout management oversight and to be responsible for developing prescribed basin management plans. The bill would require the department to give priority to stocking native hatchery-produced species in California's waters where stocking is determined to be appropriate by the department. The bill would require the department to ensure that all trout stocked in waters of the state for recreational purposes, except as provided, are unable to reproduce through triploidy or other means. The bill would authorize the department to provide specified outreach to anglers to promote awareness, would authorize the department to develop, conduct, and respond to angler preference and satisfaction surveys, and would require educational programs utilizing the hatcheries to be encouraged. The bill would require the department to review angling regulations periodically and adjust those regulations to ensure consistency with the Strategic Plan for Trout Management. Existing law requires 3313% of the fees derived from the issuance of sport fishing licenses, with certain exceptions, to be deposited into the Hatchery and Inland Fisheries Fund within the State Treasury. Existing law authorizes moneys in the fund to be expended, upon appropriation, in support of department programs related to the management, maintenance, and capital improvement of California's fish hatcheries, the Heritage and Wild Trout Program, enforcement activities, and other activities eligible to be funded from revenue generated by sport fishing license fees. Existing law requires that those fund moneys be used for specified purposes, including the attainment of prescribed fish production and release goals for state hatcheries. This bill would instead authorize the expenditure of those moneys, consistent with specified existing law, to support programs of the department related to management, maintenance, and capital improvement of California's fish hatcheries, the Heritage and Wild Trout program, and enforcement activities related thereto, and to support other activities eligible to be funded from revenue generated by sport fishing license fees. The bill would require that the fees be used for the purposes of attaining a specified hatchery production goal, the Heritage and Wild Trout Program, the development of trout management plans, and staffing, as specified. The bill would require the department, on an annual basis, to invest in hatchery facility improvements and rehabilitation to ensure progress towards achievement of specified hatchery fish production targets. The bill would authorize the department, beginning January 1, 2015, to obtain California-based hatchery fish if specified criteria are satisfied. The bill would establish funding for "Heritage Trout Waters" as a priority for the fund. The bill would appropriate $1,000,000 from the Hatchery and Inland Fisheries Fund to the department for capital outlay expenditures necessary to improve state hatchery facility and system improvements to achieve specified hatchery fish production goals.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In Senate. Consideration of Governor's item veto pending.

  2. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 565, Statutes of 2012.

  3. Approved by the Governor with item veto.

  4. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

  5. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 17. Page 5114.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 48. Noes 26. Page 6773.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 6750.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 29).

  12. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Ayes 47. Noes 26. Page 6470.)

  13. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  14. Ordered to third reading.

  15. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 6260.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (August 16).

  19. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  22. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  23. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  24. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 3742.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  25. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  26. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3591.) (May 24).

  27. Set for hearing May 24.

  28. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  29. Set for hearing April 30.

  30. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3121.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  31. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  32. Set for hearing April 10.

  33. Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  34. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Pavley · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Pavley

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 26 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 472406
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 482606
% of votes cast 60%33%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Huber — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fuentes — Not Voting
Galgiani — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Torres — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 17 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211501
Democratic 1100
Republican 0100
Total 221701
% of votes cast 55%43%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Anderson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 25 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502304
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 512504
% of votes cast 64%31%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Fong — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Butler — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Campos — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Davis — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Halderman — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9502
Democratic 1000
Total 10502
% of votes cast 59%29%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Mitchell — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Hill — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Nay
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8202
Republican 0001
Total 8203
% of votes cast 62%15%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Not Voting
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 24 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221401
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 241402
% of votes cast 60%35%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5200
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Kehoe — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lieu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1148 do?
(1) The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Wetlands Mitigation Bank Act of 1993 provides for the establishment of wetlands mitigation bank sites to increase the total wetlands acreage and values within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. This bill would provide that no conservation bank, mitigation bank, or conservation and mitigation bank is operative, vested, or final, nor bank credits issued, until the Department of Fish and Game has approved the bank in writing and a conservation easement has been recorded on the site. The bill would require the department to follow certain procedures and authorize the department to charge and adjust specified fees to cover the reasonable costs of the department reviewing various documents when a person is interested in establishing a bank. The bill would require the department to deposit revenues of those fees in a separate dedicated account within the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. The bill would require the department to establish and maintain a database that includes certain information about banks and to make this data available on its Internet Web site or accessible by a link from the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department to adopt and amend guidelines and criteria to amend provisions relating to the department's review of a bank. (2) Under existing law, the changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for State and Local Government Purchases of Goods and Services is used as the index to determine an annual rate of increase or decrease in the fees for hunting and fishing licenses, stamps, permits, and tags. Under existing law, the department issues lifetime sportsman's licenses, hunting licenses, sport fishing ocean enhancement stamps, commercial fishing ocean enhancement stamps, commercial fishing ocean enhancement validations, commercial fishing licenses, commercial fish business licenses, commercial boat registrations, sport fishing ocean enhancement validations, trapping licenses, and sport fishing licenses, and existing law establishes base fees for those entitlements, adjusted annually pursuant to the index. This bill would require the Fish and Game Commission to adjust the base fees for lifetime sportsman's licenses, hunting licenses, sport fishing ocean enhancement stamps and validations, commercial fishing ocean enhancement stamps and validations, commercial fishing licenses, commercial fish business licenses, commercial boat registrations, trapping licenses, and sport fishing licenses, as necessary, to fully recover, but not exceed, all reasonable administrative and implementation costs of the department and the commission relating to those licenses. The bill would also authorize the department to establish fees and to adjust statutorily imposed fees by regulation for certain filings, permits, determinations, or other department actions. (3) Existing law relating to the Office of Planning and Research requires every officer, agency, department, or instrumentality of state government to cooperate in the preparation and maintenance of the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report and to ensure that their entity's functional plan is consistent with specified state planning priorities and annually demonstrate, when requesting infrastructure as specified, how the plans are consistent with those priorities. Existing law requires those entities to comply with any request for advice, assistance, information, or other material. This bill would specify that the subject entities include certain trustee agencies. (4) Existing law, the Trout and Steelhead Conservation and Management Planning Act of 1979, requires the department to determine whether a stream or lake should be managed as a wild trout fishery, or whether its management should involve the planting of native trout species to supplement wild trout populations. Existing law requires the commission to develop additional wild trout waters. Existing law requires the department to prepare a list each year of no less than 25 miles of stream or stream segments and at least one lake that it deems suitable for consideration as wild trout waters and to submit this list to the commission. Existing law requires the commission to annually submit a report to the Legislature that includes its reasons why any stream or lake listed by the department was or was not included in the program. Existing law requires the department to prepare and complete management plans for all wild trout waters not more than 3 years following their initial designation by the commission, and to update the management plan every 5 years following completion of the initial management plan. This bill would revise the findings and declarations of the act. The bill would require the department to maintain and continuously revise specified inventories prepared for each stream, stream system, or lake, with the goal of reviewing every watershed once per decade, and would require the department to make those inventories publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the commission, instead, to report to the Legislature regarding progress in implementing the wild trout program on even-numbered years and would require the report to be publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department every 5 years to update the Strategic Plan for Trout Management published in November 2003 as necessary to guide the state's trout management. The bill would require the department to prepare and complete trout management plans consistent with the Strategic Plan for Trout Management for all wild trout waters, to be reviewed as prescribed, and to make the Strategic Plan for Trout Management and the trout management plans publicly available on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the department, by January 1, 2014, to form an intradepartmental strategic trout management team to provide statewide direction and trout management oversight and to be responsible for developing prescribed basin management plans. The bill would require the department to give priority to stocking native hatchery-produced species in California's waters where stocking is determined to be appropriate by the department. The bill would require the department to ensure that all trout stocked in waters of the state for recreational purposes, except as provided, are unable to reproduce through triploidy or other means. The bill would authorize the department to provide specified outreach to anglers to promote awareness, would authorize the department to develop, conduct, and respond to angler preference and satisfaction surveys, and would require educational programs utilizing the hatcheries to be encouraged. The bill would require the department to review angling regulations periodically and adjust those regulations to ensure consistency with the Strategic Plan for Trout Management. Existing law requires 3313% of the fees derived from the issuance of sport fishing licenses, with certain exceptions, to be deposited into the Hatchery and Inland Fisheries Fund within the State Treasury. Existing law authorizes moneys in the fund to be expended, upon appropriation, in support of department programs related to the management, maintenance, and capital improvement of California's fish hatcheries, the Heritage and Wild Trout Program, enforcement activities, and other activities eligible to be funded from revenue generated by sport fishing license fees. Existing law requires that those fund moneys be used for specified purposes, including the attainment of prescribed fish production and release goals for state hatcheries. This bill would instead authorize the expenditure of those moneys, consistent with specified existing law, to support programs of the department related to management, maintenance, and capital improvement of California's fish hatcheries, the Heritage and Wild Trout program, and enforcement activities related thereto, and to support other activities eligible to be funded from revenue generated by sport fishing license fees. The bill would require that the fees be used for the purposes of attaining a specified hatchery production goal, the Heritage and Wild Trout Program, the development of trout management plans, and staffing, as specified. The bill would require the department, on an annual basis, to invest in hatchery facility improvements and rehabilitation to ensure progress towards achievement of specified hatchery fish production targets. The bill would authorize the department, beginning January 1, 2015, to obtain California-based hatchery fish if specified criteria are satisfied. The bill would establish funding for "Heritage Trout Waters" as a priority for the fund. The bill would appropriate $1,000,000 from the Hatchery and Inland Fisheries Fund to the department for capital outlay expenditures necessary to improve state hatchery facility and system improvements to achieve specified hatchery fish production goals.
Who sponsors SB 1148?
SB 1148 is sponsored by Pavley.
What is the current status of SB 1148?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1148?
Track SB 1148 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1148

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1148

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →