California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1614 — Fort Ord Reuse Authority.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 743, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act, establishes the Fort Ord Reuse Authority to prepare, adopt, finance, and implement a plan for the use and development of the territory previously occupied by the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County. The act provides that the authority is governed by a board consisting of members from specified cities and authorizes the board to acquire and dispose of existing real property and facilities within the Fort Ord territory, to plan, finance, and construct new public capital facilities within that territory, to levy assessments, special taxes, or development fees, and to issue bonds. The act makes these provisions inoperative when the board determines that 80% of the territory of Fort Ord that is designated for development or reuse in the plan has been developed or reused in a manner consistent with the plan, or June 30, 2014, whichever occurs first, and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2015. This bill would instead make the act inoperative when the board makes the above specified determination, or June 30, 2020, whichever occurs first, and would repeal the act on January 1, 2021. This bill would also require the board to submit and approve a transition plan to the Monterey County Local Agency Formation Commission, as specified. The Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act also authorizes the board to, by ordinance, establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and requires that a city or county receiving state subventions based on the military population residing at Fort Ord continue for a specified period. This bill would repeal the board's authorization to establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and would repeal the provisions relating to the continuance of state subventions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 743, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 6103.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4569.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 13).

  13. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 14. Page 4184.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 21).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  20. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.

  22. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Blakeslee · Cosponsor
  • Cannella · Cosponsor
  • Monning · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Alejo
  • Blakeslee
  • Cannella

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1614 MONNING Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 61 Yea · 16 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 611402
Republican 0200
Democratic 0001
Total 611603
% of votes cast 76%20%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Butler — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Conway — Nay
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1614 Monning By Cannella

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Dutton — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Anderson — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1614 MONNING Assembly Third Reading

Passed 55 Yea · 14 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5412011
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 5514011
% of votes cast 69%18%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Portantino — Not Voting
Mitchell — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7200
Total 7200
% of votes cast 78%22%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Campos — Yea
Norby — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Knight — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Davis — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1614 do?
Existing law, the Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act, establishes the Fort Ord Reuse Authority to prepare, adopt, finance, and implement a plan for the use and development of the territory previously occupied by the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County. The act provides that the authority is governed by a board consisting of members from specified cities and authorizes the board to acquire and dispose of existing real property and facilities within the Fort Ord territory, to plan, finance, and construct new public capital facilities within that territory, to levy assessments, special taxes, or development fees, and to issue bonds. The act makes these provisions inoperative when the board determines that 80% of the territory of Fort Ord that is designated for development or reuse in the plan has been developed or reused in a manner consistent with the plan, or June 30, 2014, whichever occurs first, and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2015. This bill would instead make the act inoperative when the board makes the above specified determination, or June 30, 2020, whichever occurs first, and would repeal the act on January 1, 2021. This bill would also require the board to submit and approve a transition plan to the Monterey County Local Agency Formation Commission, as specified. The Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act also authorizes the board to, by ordinance, establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and requires that a city or county receiving state subventions based on the military population residing at Fort Ord continue for a specified period. This bill would repeal the board's authorization to establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and would repeal the provisions relating to the continuance of state subventions.
Who sponsors AB 1614?
AB 1614 is sponsored by Alejo, Blakeslee, Cannella, and Monning.
What is the current status of AB 1614?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1614?
Track AB 1614 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1614

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1614

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →