Eggs: assessment fees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 549 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 549.
You're tracking SB 549
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 549 — Eggs: assessment fees.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 340, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires California and out-of-state egg handlers and producers to pay to the Secretary of Food and Agriculture a maximum fee of $0.05 for each 30 dozen eggs sold in this state, as provided. Any person who commits a 2nd or subsequent violation of these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. The fees paid to the secretary under these provisions are deposited in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, a continuously appropriated fund for these purposes. The secretary is authorized to establish a lower rate for those fees if the funds derived from the assessment are more than reasonably necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement of the preparation for market and marketing of eggs, as specified. This bill would raise the maximum fee to $0.15 for each 30 dozen eggs sold in this state, and would expand the scope of the fee requirement to include out-of-state egg handlers and producers who bring egg products, as defined, into the state. By increasing moneys deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Because this bill would expand the scope of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would further require the secretary to establish a lower rate for those fees if the funds derived from the assessment are more than reasonably necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement, as specified. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/26/11 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2011
- Enrolled 08/31/11 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2011
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- SB549 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 340, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 12. Page 2637.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (August 17).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 6. Page 1178.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1014.) (May 16).
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 845.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Susan Rubio · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Rubio, Susan Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 67 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 15% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 15% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 549 do?
- (1) Existing law requires California and out-of-state egg handlers and producers to pay to the Secretary of Food and Agriculture a maximum fee of $0.05 for each 30 dozen eggs sold in this state, as provided. Any person who commits a 2nd or subsequent violation of these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. The fees paid to the secretary under these provisions are deposited in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, a continuously appropriated fund for these purposes. The secretary is authorized to establish a lower rate for those fees if the funds derived from the assessment are more than reasonably necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement of the preparation for market and marketing of eggs, as specified. This bill would raise the maximum fee to $0.15 for each 30 dozen eggs sold in this state, and would expand the scope of the fee requirement to include out-of-state egg handlers and producers who bring egg products, as defined, into the state. By increasing moneys deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Because this bill would expand the scope of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would further require the secretary to establish a lower rate for those fees if the funds derived from the assessment are more than reasonably necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement, as specified. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 549?
- SB 549 is sponsored by Rubio, Susan (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 549?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 549?
- Track SB 549 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 549
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 549
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →