California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2265 — Improvement districts.

Last action — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 and the Multifamily Improvement District Law both require a management district plan for an improvement district proposed under either law to include specified information. Both laws require a city council to contract with a nonprofit corporation if the management district plan designates the nonprofit corporation to provide services to the improvement district. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 sets forth the procedures for establishing an assessment district under the act, including the preparation of reports by an engineer. This bill would prohibit the city council, the owners' association, and the nonprofit corporation, if one is designated, in the case of a district formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 or the Multifamily Improvement District Law, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district. The bill would also prohibit a local agency, in the case of an assessment district formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  2. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  3. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 41. Noes 31. Page 5196.)

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (May 9).

  8. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  9. Read first time.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  11. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2265 HERNÁNDEZ Assembly Third Reading

Passed 41 Yea · 31 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 402908
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 413108
% of votes cast 51%39%0%10%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Nay
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Carter — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Huber — Nay
Huffman — Nay
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Atkins — Not Voting
Chesbro — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Ammiano — Not Voting
Mendoza — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Nay
Fuentes — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Campos — Yea
Davis — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2265 do?
The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 and the Multifamily Improvement District Law both require a management district plan for an improvement district proposed under either law to include specified information. Both laws require a city council to contract with a nonprofit corporation if the management district plan designates the nonprofit corporation to provide services to the improvement district. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 sets forth the procedures for establishing an assessment district under the act, including the preparation of reports by an engineer. This bill would prohibit the city council, the owners' association, and the nonprofit corporation, if one is designated, in the case of a district formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 or the Multifamily Improvement District Law, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district. The bill would also prohibit a local agency, in the case of an assessment district formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district.
Who sponsors AB 2265?
AB 2265 is sponsored by Roger Hernández.
What is the current status of AB 2265?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2265?
Track AB 2265 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2265

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2265

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →