Real estate appraisers: licensing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2519 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2519.
You're tracking AB 2519
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2519 — Real estate appraisers: licensing.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 683, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate appraisers and vests the duty of enforcing and administering that law in the Office of Real Estate Appraisers. Existing law authorizes the Director of the Office of Real Estate Appraisers to adopt regulations governing the process and procedure of licensing real estate appraisers, as specified. (1) Existing law authorizes the Director of the Office of Real Estate Appraisers to issue to a licensee, or course provider, as specified, a citation that may impose the requirement to complete an education course or courses by the licensee, under specified conditions. Existing law provides for the automatic suspension of a real estate appraiser's license if the licensee fails to satisfactorily or timely complete an education course as imposed by the citation. This bill would prohibit the renewal of a license if the licensee fails to satisfactorily complete the additional education requirements imposed by the citation, as specified. (2) Existing law authorizes the office to publish a summary of public disciplinary actions taken by the office against licensees and registrants, including resignations while under investigation. This bill would authorize the office to institute or continue disciplinary proceedings against a licensee or registrant, or to suspend or revoke a license or certificate of registration, notwithstanding the expiration, or suspension, cancellation, or forfeiture by operation of law, or by an order of the office or a court of law, of the license or certificate of registration, as specified. (3) Existing law requires fingerprinting and background checks, as specified, by the Department of Justice of applicants for real estate appraiser licenses and each controlling person of an applicant for registration as an appraisal management company. This bill would require the applicants for real estate appraiser licenses and each controlling person of each applicant for registration as an appraisal management company to submit to the Department of Justice fingerprint images and information via LiveScan. The bill would also require that applicants located out of state submit fingerprint cards with their application package, for submission by the office to the department. (4) Existing law sets forth standards with which an appraisal management company needs to comply regarding independent contractor appraisers, including standards relating to licensure, performance of appraisal services, and appraisal reports. This bill would, in addition, make these requirements applicable to employee appraisers, as specified. (5) Existing law prohibits a registered appraisal management company from requiring an appraiser to provide it with the appraiser's digital signature or seal. Existing law, however, allows an appraiser to provide his or her digital signature or seal to another person voluntarily. This bill would allow an appraiser to provide his or her digital signature or seal to another person only to the extent permissible under the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraiser Practice. (6) Existing law requires the department to charge licensing and issuance-related fees to each applicant, and requires that these fees be paid to the office at the time of filing the application. Existing law also provides that fees may be paid, among other means, by government purchase order. This bill would remove the requirement that issuance-related fees be paid at the time of filing that application. The bill would also delete the provision allowing payment of these fees by government purchase order. (7) Existing law requires that applications for a license be submitted to the office within one year of the successful completion of the required examination. This bill would instead specify that an applicant is not eligible to have a license issued unless he or she notifies the office within one year of successful completion of the required examination. (8) This bill would also delete an obsolete reference and make other conforming changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2012
- Enrolled 08/29/12 - Enrolled pdf August 29, 2012
- Amended 05/03/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2519 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 683, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4783.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4789.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Bill Berryhill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2519 do?
- Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate appraisers and vests the duty of enforcing and administering that law in the Office of Real Estate Appraisers. Existing law authorizes the Director of the Office of Real Estate Appraisers to adopt regulations governing the process and procedure of licensing real estate appraisers, as specified. (1) Existing law authorizes the Director of the Office of Real Estate Appraisers to issue to a licensee, or course provider, as specified, a citation that may impose the requirement to complete an education course or courses by the licensee, under specified conditions. Existing law provides for the automatic suspension of a real estate appraiser's license if the licensee fails to satisfactorily or timely complete an education course as imposed by the citation. This bill would prohibit the renewal of a license if the licensee fails to satisfactorily complete the additional education requirements imposed by the citation, as specified. (2) Existing law authorizes the office to publish a summary of public disciplinary actions taken by the office against licensees and registrants, including resignations while under investigation. This bill would authorize the office to institute or continue disciplinary proceedings against a licensee or registrant, or to suspend or revoke a license or certificate of registration, notwithstanding the expiration, or suspension, cancellation, or forfeiture by operation of law, or by an order of the office or a court of law, of the license or certificate of registration, as specified. (3) Existing law requires fingerprinting and background checks, as specified, by the Department of Justice of applicants for real estate appraiser licenses and each controlling person of an applicant for registration as an appraisal management company. This bill would require the applicants for real estate appraiser licenses and each controlling person of each applicant for registration as an appraisal management company to submit to the Department of Justice fingerprint images and information via LiveScan. The bill would also require that applicants located out of state submit fingerprint cards with their application package, for submission by the office to the department. (4) Existing law sets forth standards with which an appraisal management company needs to comply regarding independent contractor appraisers, including standards relating to licensure, performance of appraisal services, and appraisal reports. This bill would, in addition, make these requirements applicable to employee appraisers, as specified. (5) Existing law prohibits a registered appraisal management company from requiring an appraiser to provide it with the appraiser's digital signature or seal. Existing law, however, allows an appraiser to provide his or her digital signature or seal to another person voluntarily. This bill would allow an appraiser to provide his or her digital signature or seal to another person only to the extent permissible under the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraiser Practice. (6) Existing law requires the department to charge licensing and issuance-related fees to each applicant, and requires that these fees be paid to the office at the time of filing the application. Existing law also provides that fees may be paid, among other means, by government purchase order. This bill would remove the requirement that issuance-related fees be paid at the time of filing that application. The bill would also delete the provision allowing payment of these fees by government purchase order. (7) Existing law requires that applications for a license be submitted to the office within one year of the successful completion of the required examination. This bill would instead specify that an applicant is not eligible to have a license issued unless he or she notifies the office within one year of successful completion of the required examination. (8) This bill would also delete an obsolete reference and make other conforming changes.
- Who sponsors AB 2519?
- AB 2519 is sponsored by Bill Berryhill.
- What is the current status of AB 2519?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2519?
- Track AB 2519 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2519
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2519
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →