AB 2046 — Property taxation: change in ownership: exclusion: floating homes.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 817, Statutes of 2012.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property. For purposes of this limitation, "full cash value" is defined as the assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of that real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred. Existing property tax law specifies those circumstances in which the transfer of ownership interests results in a change in ownership of the real property, and provides that certain transfers do not result in a change of ownership. This bill would provide that a transfer of a floating home marina, as defined, to a nonprofit corporation, stock cooperative corporation, limited equity stock cooperative, or other entity formed by the tenants of a floating home marina for the purpose of purchasing the floating home marina does not constitute a change in ownership, provided that a specified condition is met. This bill would also provide that, if the transfer of a floating home marina has been excluded from a change in ownership and the floating home marina has not been converted, as specified, any transfer of shares of the voting stock of, or other ownership or membership interests in, the entity that acquired the floating home marina shall be a change in ownership of a pro rata portion of the real property, as defined, of the floating home marina. This bill would require a floating home marina that does not utilize recorded deeds to transfer ownership interest in the berths to file a report with the county assessor's office, as specified. This bill would require the new resident owner or other purchaser or transferee of a floating home within a floating home marina that does not utilize recorded deeds to transfer ownership interest in the berths to file a specified change in ownership statement, which is required to be filed under penalty of perjury, within 30 days of a change in ownership. By imposing new duties upon local officials with respect to changes in ownership of floating home marinas, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2012
- Enrolled 09/06/12 - Enrolled pdf September 06, 2012
- Amended 05/21/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 21, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- AB2046 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 817, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 3. Page 4869.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 25. Page 5179.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (May 14).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 8% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 23 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 25 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 31% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Nay |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2046 do?
- The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property. For purposes of this limitation, "full cash value" is defined as the assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of that real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred. Existing property tax law specifies those circumstances in which the transfer of ownership interests results in a change in ownership of the real property, and provides that certain transfers do not result in a change of ownership. This bill would provide that a transfer of a floating home marina, as defined, to a nonprofit corporation, stock cooperative corporation, limited equity stock cooperative, or other entity formed by the tenants of a floating home marina for the purpose of purchasing the floating home marina does not constitute a change in ownership, provided that a specified condition is met. This bill would also provide that, if the transfer of a floating home marina has been excluded from a change in ownership and the floating home marina has not been converted, as specified, any transfer of shares of the voting stock of, or other ownership or membership interests in, the entity that acquired the floating home marina shall be a change in ownership of a pro rata portion of the real property, as defined, of the floating home marina. This bill would require a floating home marina that does not utilize recorded deeds to transfer ownership interest in the berths to file a report with the county assessor's office, as specified. This bill would require the new resident owner or other purchaser or transferee of a floating home within a floating home marina that does not utilize recorded deeds to transfer ownership interest in the berths to file a specified change in ownership statement, which is required to be filed under penalty of perjury, within 30 days of a change in ownership. By imposing new duties upon local officials with respect to changes in ownership of floating home marinas, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 2046?
- AB 2046 is sponsored by Huffman and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 2046?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2046?
- Track AB 2046 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2046
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2046
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →