AB 828 — CalFresh: eligibility: drug felonies.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the CalFresh program, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under CalFresh, if any one of specified eligibility requirements is met. This bill instead would provide that a person convicted of any drug felony shall be eligible for aid under CalFresh, eliminate the above-referenced exceptions, and make related changes. The bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement its provisions through an all-county letter or similar instruction from the director. By changing the eligibility standards under CalFresh, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/13/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 13, 2012
- Amended 03/08/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 08, 2012
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- AB828 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 30. Page 1497.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 4).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 30 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 828 do?
- Existing law provides for the CalFresh program, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under CalFresh, if any one of specified eligibility requirements is met. This bill instead would provide that a person convicted of any drug felony shall be eligible for aid under CalFresh, eliminate the above-referenced exceptions, and make related changes. The bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement its provisions through an all-county letter or similar instruction from the director. By changing the eligibility standards under CalFresh, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 828?
- AB 828 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 828?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 828?
- Track AB 828 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 828
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 828
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →