State budget.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 27 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 27.
You're tracking AB 27
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 27 — State budget.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, no bill other than the Budget Bill may be heard or acted upon by a committee or either house of the Legislature until the 31st day after the bill is introduced, unless the house dispenses with this requirement via a 34 vote. This bill would require that the Budget Bill be in print and posted on a publicly accessible Internet Web site for 72 hours before it could be passed and sent to the Governor. Under existing law, a state agency or court for which an appropriation is made is generally required to submit to the Department of Finance for approval a complete and detailed budget setting forth all proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. This bill would require each state agency and court for which a General Fund appropriation is made to submit a budget that reduces its General Fund appropriation by 20% from the previous year. This bill would also require each state agency and court to identify any mandates or capital projects that would be impacted by the reduction in funding and to develop a system for evaluating the effectiveness of the agency in meeting its stated core functions that identifies the impact of the reduction in General Fund funding on those core functions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 12/06/10 - Introduced Current pdf December 06, 2010
- AB27 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gorell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gorell
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 27 do?
- Under existing law, no bill other than the Budget Bill may be heard or acted upon by a committee or either house of the Legislature until the 31st day after the bill is introduced, unless the house dispenses with this requirement via a 34 vote. This bill would require that the Budget Bill be in print and posted on a publicly accessible Internet Web site for 72 hours before it could be passed and sent to the Governor. Under existing law, a state agency or court for which an appropriation is made is generally required to submit to the Department of Finance for approval a complete and detailed budget setting forth all proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. This bill would require each state agency and court for which a General Fund appropriation is made to submit a budget that reduces its General Fund appropriation by 20% from the previous year. This bill would also require each state agency and court to identify any mandates or capital projects that would be impacted by the reduction in funding and to develop a system for evaluating the effectiveness of the agency in meeting its stated core functions that identifies the impact of the reduction in General Fund funding on those core functions.
- Who sponsors AB 27?
- AB 27 is sponsored by Gorell.
- What is the current status of AB 27?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 27?
- Track AB 27 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 27
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 27
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →