California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1674 — Child custody: visitation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 692, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing child custody law requires the Judicial Council to develop standards for supervised visitation providers in accordance with specified guidelines. This bill would require any standards for supervised visitation providers adopted by the Judicial Council to conform to the provisions of the bill. The bill would require supervised visitation providers to be professional providers or nonprofessional providers, as specified. The bill would require the court, in any case in which it has determined there is domestic violence or child abuse or neglect, as specified, and it determines that supervision is necessary, to consider whether to use a professional or nonprofessional provider based upon the child's best interest. The bill would also require professional providers to receive 24 hours of training in certain subjects. The bill would require providers of supervised visitation to advise the parties of certain legal rights, report suspected child abuse to the appropriate agency, and to suspend or terminate visitation in certain cases in accordance with specified procedures.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 692, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:10 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 19. Page 6409.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 4749.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (July 3).

  14. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  15. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 20. Page 5060.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (May 16).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Read second time and amended.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 24).

  25. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  28. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  29. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  31. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ma · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ma

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1674 MA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 59 Yea · 19 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 581702
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 591902
% of votes cast 74%24%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Fletcher — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Beall — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1674 Ma By Leno

Passed 23 Yea · 10 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21907
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231007
% of votes cast 58%25%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Huff — Nay
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Rubio — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

AB 1674 MA Assembly Third Reading

Passed 54 Yea · 20 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 531806
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 542006
% of votes cast 68%25%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cook — Yea
Williams — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Fong — Not Voting
Hueso — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Beall — Nay
Block — Nay
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Yamada — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13102
Democratic 1000
Total 14102
% of votes cast 82%6%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Campos — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1674 do?
Existing child custody law requires the Judicial Council to develop standards for supervised visitation providers in accordance with specified guidelines. This bill would require any standards for supervised visitation providers adopted by the Judicial Council to conform to the provisions of the bill. The bill would require supervised visitation providers to be professional providers or nonprofessional providers, as specified. The bill would require the court, in any case in which it has determined there is domestic violence or child abuse or neglect, as specified, and it determines that supervision is necessary, to consider whether to use a professional or nonprofessional provider based upon the child's best interest. The bill would also require professional providers to receive 24 hours of training in certain subjects. The bill would require providers of supervised visitation to advise the parties of certain legal rights, report suspected child abuse to the appropriate agency, and to suspend or terminate visitation in certain cases in accordance with specified procedures.
Who sponsors AB 1674?
AB 1674 is sponsored by Ma.
What is the current status of AB 1674?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1674?
Track AB 1674 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1674

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1674

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →