Probation: community corrections multidisciplinary teams.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 678 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 678.
You're tracking SB 678
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 678 — Probation: community corrections multidisciplinary teams.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the members of multidisciplinary teams engaged in the prevention, identification, and control of juvenile crime to share certain information with each other, as specified. This bill would, in addition, authorize counties, for purposes of providing evidence-based practices and supervision, to convene community corrections multidisciplinary teams engaged in providing community corrections supervision and evidenced-based rehabilitation programs, as specified. The bill would require each community corrections multidisciplinary team to maintain an informed consent policy in order to authorize the sharing of confidential, privileged, or protected information among members of the team, as specified. The bill would additionally require the county probation officer in each county utilizing a community corrections multidisciplinary team to develop and implement a memorandum of understanding between the agencies participating in the community corrections multidisciplinary team that includes, among other things, a description of the types of information and writings that may be shared between team members.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/29/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 29, 2011
- Amended 05/27/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 27, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB678 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1274.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Negrete McLeod.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 863.) (May 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Negrete McLeod · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Negrete McLeod
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 678 do?
- Existing law authorizes the members of multidisciplinary teams engaged in the prevention, identification, and control of juvenile crime to share certain information with each other, as specified. This bill would, in addition, authorize counties, for purposes of providing evidence-based practices and supervision, to convene community corrections multidisciplinary teams engaged in providing community corrections supervision and evidenced-based rehabilitation programs, as specified. The bill would require each community corrections multidisciplinary team to maintain an informed consent policy in order to authorize the sharing of confidential, privileged, or protected information among members of the team, as specified. The bill would additionally require the county probation officer in each county utilizing a community corrections multidisciplinary team to develop and implement a memorandum of understanding between the agencies participating in the community corrections multidisciplinary team that includes, among other things, a description of the types of information and writings that may be shared between team members.
- Who sponsors SB 678?
- SB 678 is sponsored by Negrete McLeod.
- What is the current status of SB 678?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 678?
- Track SB 678 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 678
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 678
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →