California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1799 — Pupil records: pupil transfers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 369, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires a pupil's former school district, as defined, or private school to transfer the pupil's permanent record, or a copy thereof, upon a request from the school district, as defined, or private school where the pupil intends to enroll. This bill would instead require the former public school or private school to perform the transfer of the pupil's permanent record or copy of it no later than 10 schooldays, as defined, following the date the request is received. The bill would state legislative findings and declarations regarding the importance of the academic record of a transferring pupil and the accuracy of those records. The bill would provide that it does not supersede any other provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for specific pupil populations, including, but not limited to, provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for (1) pupils in foster care and (2) individuals with exceptional needs. By imposing a new requirement on public schools to transfer records within 10 schooldays, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 369, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:45 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6384.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4783.).

  8. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6).

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20).

  13. Referred to Com. on ED.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5048.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Read second time and amended.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 11).

  22. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  23. Referred to Com. on ED.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bradford · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Bradford

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1799 BRADFORD Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 77000
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Butler — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Logue — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent #16 AB1799 Bradford By Hancock

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Dutton — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Dutton — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1799 BRADFORD Assembly Third Reading

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74003
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Butler — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Perea — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Portantino — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Conway — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cook — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Norby — Yea
Silva — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1799 do?
Existing law requires a pupil's former school district, as defined, or private school to transfer the pupil's permanent record, or a copy thereof, upon a request from the school district, as defined, or private school where the pupil intends to enroll. This bill would instead require the former public school or private school to perform the transfer of the pupil's permanent record or copy of it no later than 10 schooldays, as defined, following the date the request is received. The bill would state legislative findings and declarations regarding the importance of the academic record of a transferring pupil and the accuracy of those records. The bill would provide that it does not supersede any other provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for specific pupil populations, including, but not limited to, provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for (1) pupils in foster care and (2) individuals with exceptional needs. By imposing a new requirement on public schools to transfer records within 10 schooldays, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1799?
AB 1799 is sponsored by Bradford.
What is the current status of AB 1799?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1799?
Track AB 1799 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1799

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1799

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →