AB 658 — State Board of Equalization: administration.
Last action — In committee: that the measure be held in committee pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law provides that the place of sale or purchase is the place where the tangible personal property is physically located at the time the act constituting the sale or purchase takes place, with sales tax thereby being imposed on retail sales of tangible personal property physically located in this state at the time of sale. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law and provides the methods of allocating those local sales and use taxes to a city or county. This bill would clarify that the place of sale or purchase of property for purposes of determining whether sales tax or use tax applies to the transaction is determined in the same manner under the Sales and Use Tax Law and the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, and would state that this provision is declaratory of existing law. Existing law provides that after January 1, 2007, and before January 1, 2013, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, Underground Storage Tank Maintenance Fee Law, and Fee Collection Procedures Law allow the State Board of Equalization to accept an offer in compromise on a final tax liability, as defined, imposed under or in accordance with those laws regardless of whether the liabilities are generated from a business, that has been discontinued or transferred or whether the taxpayer or feepayer has a controlling interest or association with a similar business as the transferred or discontinued business, as prescribed. Under these laws, a taxpayer or feepayer would be guilty of a felony if the taxpayer or feepayer conceals specified property or receives, withholds, destroys, mutilates, or falsifies specified items or makes a false statement related to the offer in compromise, as specified. This bill would extend the repeal date for the above provisions to January 1, 2018. The bill, by extending the repeal date, would expand an existing crime and, thus, impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/20/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 20, 2012
- Amended 01/04/12 - Amended Assembly pdf January 04, 2012
- Introduced 02/16/11 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2011
- AB658 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: that the measure be held in committee pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
-
In Senate. Held at Desk.
-
Ordered to the Senate.
-
Withdrawn from Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4444.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3607.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 19).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lisa Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 72 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 658 do?
- The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law provides that the place of sale or purchase is the place where the tangible personal property is physically located at the time the act constituting the sale or purchase takes place, with sales tax thereby being imposed on retail sales of tangible personal property physically located in this state at the time of sale. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law and provides the methods of allocating those local sales and use taxes to a city or county. This bill would clarify that the place of sale or purchase of property for purposes of determining whether sales tax or use tax applies to the transaction is determined in the same manner under the Sales and Use Tax Law and the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, and would state that this provision is declaratory of existing law. Existing law provides that after January 1, 2007, and before January 1, 2013, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, Underground Storage Tank Maintenance Fee Law, and Fee Collection Procedures Law allow the State Board of Equalization to accept an offer in compromise on a final tax liability, as defined, imposed under or in accordance with those laws regardless of whether the liabilities are generated from a business, that has been discontinued or transferred or whether the taxpayer or feepayer has a controlling interest or association with a similar business as the transferred or discontinued business, as prescribed. Under these laws, a taxpayer or feepayer would be guilty of a felony if the taxpayer or feepayer conceals specified property or receives, withholds, destroys, mutilates, or falsifies specified items or makes a false statement related to the offer in compromise, as specified. This bill would extend the repeal date for the above provisions to January 1, 2018. The bill, by extending the repeal date, would expand an existing crime and, thus, impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 658?
- AB 658 is sponsored by Calderon, Lisa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 658?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 658?
- Track AB 658 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 658
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 658
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →