Marriage licenses: vital records: fees: domestic violence: Solano County.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 154 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 154.
You're tracking SB 154
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 154 — Marriage licenses: vital records: fees: domestic violence: Solano County.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 120, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for providing certified copies of vital records, including marriage certificates, birth certificates, fetal death records, and death records. Existing law provides for the establishment of county domestic violence program special funds for the purpose of funding local domestic violence programs. Certain fees payable at the time a marriage license or a certified copy of any of the above vital records is issued may be collected by the county clerks for deposit into these funds. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, additionally authorizes the Solano County Board of Supervisors, upon making certain findings and declarations, to authorize an increase in fees for marriage licenses and confidential marriage licenses and for certified copies of certain vital records, up to $2. Existing law authorizes the Solano County Board of Supervisors to make further increases in fees each year, as specified. Existing law requires the fees to be allocated for purposes relating to domestic violence prevention, intervention, and prosecution. Existing law required the Solano County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2009, to submit a report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill would extend the repeal date of the above-described provisions to January 1, 2012. This bill would extend the operation of the above-described provisions indefinitely. This bill would require the Solano County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2014, to submit a followup report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/25/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 25, 2011
- Enrolled 07/08/11 - Enrolled pdf July 08, 2011
- Amended 04/05/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2011
- Introduced 02/02/11 - Introduced pdf February 02, 2011
- SB154 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 120, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 46. Noes 28. Page 2228.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (June 14).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 17. Page 702.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 494.) (March 29).
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wolk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wolk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 26 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 28 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 35% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 17 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 154 do?
- Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for providing certified copies of vital records, including marriage certificates, birth certificates, fetal death records, and death records. Existing law provides for the establishment of county domestic violence program special funds for the purpose of funding local domestic violence programs. Certain fees payable at the time a marriage license or a certified copy of any of the above vital records is issued may be collected by the county clerks for deposit into these funds. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, additionally authorizes the Solano County Board of Supervisors, upon making certain findings and declarations, to authorize an increase in fees for marriage licenses and confidential marriage licenses and for certified copies of certain vital records, up to $2. Existing law authorizes the Solano County Board of Supervisors to make further increases in fees each year, as specified. Existing law requires the fees to be allocated for purposes relating to domestic violence prevention, intervention, and prosecution. Existing law required the Solano County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2009, to submit a report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill would extend the repeal date of the above-described provisions to January 1, 2012. This bill would extend the operation of the above-described provisions indefinitely. This bill would require the Solano County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2014, to submit a followup report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- Who sponsors SB 154?
- SB 154 is sponsored by Wolk.
- What is the current status of SB 154?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 154?
- Track SB 154 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 154
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 154
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →