SB 1069 — Deficiency judgments.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 64, Statutes of 2012.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that no deficiency judgment shall lie following a judicial foreclosure with respect to, among other things, a deed of trust or mortgage given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of real property, or under a deed of trust or mortgage on a dwelling to secure repayment of a purchase money loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling. This bill would additionally provide that no deficiency judgment shall lie in any event on any loan, refinance, or other credit transaction that is used to refinance a purchase money loan, as defined, or subsequent refinances of a purchase money loan, except to the extent that the lender or creditor advances new principal which is not applied to any obligation owed or to be owed under the purchase money loan, or to fees, costs, or related expenses of the refinance. The bill would provide, for purposes of these provisions, that any payment of principal for a refinanced purchase money loan would be deemed to be applied first to the principal balance of the purchase money loan, and then to the remaining principal balance, as specified. The bill's provisions would apply to a loan, refinance, or other credit transaction used to refinance a purchase money loan which is executed on or after January 1, 2013.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/09/12 - Chaptered Current pdf July 09, 2012
- Enrolled 06/26/12 - Enrolled pdf June 26, 2012
- Amended 03/15/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 15, 2012
- Introduced 02/13/12 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2012
- SB1069 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 64, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5421.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 19).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3638.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3389.) (May 1).
-
Set for hearing May 1.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Corbett · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1069 do?
- Existing law provides that no deficiency judgment shall lie following a judicial foreclosure with respect to, among other things, a deed of trust or mortgage given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of real property, or under a deed of trust or mortgage on a dwelling to secure repayment of a purchase money loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling. This bill would additionally provide that no deficiency judgment shall lie in any event on any loan, refinance, or other credit transaction that is used to refinance a purchase money loan, as defined, or subsequent refinances of a purchase money loan, except to the extent that the lender or creditor advances new principal which is not applied to any obligation owed or to be owed under the purchase money loan, or to fees, costs, or related expenses of the refinance. The bill would provide, for purposes of these provisions, that any payment of principal for a refinanced purchase money loan would be deemed to be applied first to the principal balance of the purchase money loan, and then to the remaining principal balance, as specified. The bill's provisions would apply to a loan, refinance, or other credit transaction used to refinance a purchase money loan which is executed on or after January 1, 2013.
- Who sponsors SB 1069?
- SB 1069 is sponsored by Corbett.
- What is the current status of SB 1069?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1069?
- Track SB 1069 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1069
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1069
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →