California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 580 — State parks: acquired land: limits on disposition or use.

Last action — Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation, with the consent of the Department of Finance, to acquire title to or any interest in real property that the department deems necessary or proper for the extension, improvement, or development of the state park system. Existing law also authorizes the department to accept monetary and real property gifts to be used in any connection with the state park system. This bill would, except as provided below, prohibit land acquired for the state park system, through public funds or gifts, from being disposed of or used for other purposes incompatible with state park system purposes without the substitution of other land. This bill would require the State Park and Recreation Commission, following a duly noticed public hearing, to certify that all requests to dispose of or use the land for those incompatible purposes provide for the substitution of other land meeting certain criteria. If lands that fully meet the substitution eligibility criteria cannot be acquired, the commission would be authorized, if certain conditions are met, to approve a combination of substitute park lands and monetary compensation to allow for the disposal or use of lands for those incompatible purposes. The bill would require that the commission consider requests only if the commission determines that all practical alternatives that avoid the proposed disposal or use of park lands for those incompatible purposes have been considered. This bill would provide that its provisions shall not apply to existing uses of state park lands that have been authorized on or before January 1, 2013, by written agreement with the Department of Parks and Recreation or by the general plan for a state park unit. (2) Existing law authorizes a reconfiguration of the Candlestick Point State Recreation Area (state recreation area) if certain requirements are met and authorizes the Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation to remove the land from the state recreation area and enter into an agreement to convey to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, or to the City of San Francisco, an interest in the state property, if the director makes certain findings. Existing law provides that these provisions govern an agreement entered into or convergence made pursuant to the agreement and supersede any other provision of law pertaining to the department's authority to acquire or transfer real property, or to enter into an agreement to acquire or transfer real property. This bill would provide that it does not amend, repeal, or limit the effect of this provision.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  2. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  5. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  6. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 2179.)

  7. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  9. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 1242.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  12. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 877.)

  13. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Wolk.

  14. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 17. Noes 20. Page 877.)

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 599.) (April 11).

  17. Set for hearing April 11.

  18. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 416.) (March 22).

  20. Set for hearing March 22.

  21. Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  22. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chesbro · Cosponsor
  • Evans · Cosponsor
  • Huffman · Cosponsor
  • Kehoe · Cosponsor
  • Leno · Cosponsor
  • Pavley · Cosponsor
  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (6)

  • Chesbro
  • Evans
  • Huffman
  • Kehoe
  • Leno
  • Pavley

Not signed on (115)

115 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 115 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 7 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7302
Republican 0001
Total 7303
% of votes cast 54%23%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Failed 5 Yea · 4 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5304
Republican 0100
Total 5404
% of votes cast 38%31%0%31%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12000
Republican 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Fong — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 21 Yea · 16 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201403
Democratic 1100
Republican 0100
Total 211603
% of votes cast 53%40%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Harman — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Nay
Vargas — Not Voting
Wright — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB580 Wolk Reconsider

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Correa — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Failed 17 Yea · 20 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 171802
Republican 0100
Democratic 0101
Total 172003
% of votes cast 43%50%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Negrete McLeod — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Nay
Runner — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vargas — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5301
Total 5301
% of votes cast 56%33%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Runner — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 580 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation, with the consent of the Department of Finance, to acquire title to or any interest in real property that the department deems necessary or proper for the extension, improvement, or development of the state park system. Existing law also authorizes the department to accept monetary and real property gifts to be used in any connection with the state park system. This bill would, except as provided below, prohibit land acquired for the state park system, through public funds or gifts, from being disposed of or used for other purposes incompatible with state park system purposes without the substitution of other land. This bill would require the State Park and Recreation Commission, following a duly noticed public hearing, to certify that all requests to dispose of or use the land for those incompatible purposes provide for the substitution of other land meeting certain criteria. If lands that fully meet the substitution eligibility criteria cannot be acquired, the commission would be authorized, if certain conditions are met, to approve a combination of substitute park lands and monetary compensation to allow for the disposal or use of lands for those incompatible purposes. The bill would require that the commission consider requests only if the commission determines that all practical alternatives that avoid the proposed disposal or use of park lands for those incompatible purposes have been considered. This bill would provide that its provisions shall not apply to existing uses of state park lands that have been authorized on or before January 1, 2013, by written agreement with the Department of Parks and Recreation or by the general plan for a state park unit. (2) Existing law authorizes a reconfiguration of the Candlestick Point State Recreation Area (state recreation area) if certain requirements are met and authorizes the Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation to remove the land from the state recreation area and enter into an agreement to convey to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, or to the City of San Francisco, an interest in the state property, if the director makes certain findings. Existing law provides that these provisions govern an agreement entered into or convergence made pursuant to the agreement and supersede any other provision of law pertaining to the department's authority to acquire or transfer real property, or to enter into an agreement to acquire or transfer real property. This bill would provide that it does not amend, repeal, or limit the effect of this provision.
Who sponsors SB 580?
SB 580 is sponsored by Chesbro, Evans, Huffman, Kehoe, Leno, Pavley, and Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 580?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 580?
Track SB 580 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 580

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 580

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →