Ex parte communications.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2063 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2063.
You're tracking AB 2063
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2063 — Ex parte communications.
Last action — In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality in the state. The act requires the state board to formulate and adopt state policies for water quality control, and authorizes the state board to hold any hearings and conduct any investigations in any part of the state necessary to carry out the powers vested in the state board, as specified. The act also requires the regional boards to adopt regional water quality control plans in compliance with the state policies. Existing law requires each regional board to conduct certain proceedings, including, but not limited to, holding at least 6 regular meetings each calendar year. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, provides for the conduct of administrative adjudication proceedings of state agencies. Existing law generally prohibits ex parte communication including communication during a pending proceeding, regarding any issue in the proceeding, to the presiding officer by an employee or representative of an agency that is a party to the proceeding without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate, except as specified. This bill would prohibit a state board member, a regional board member, or any interested person, as defined, from engaging in a communication that would be considered ex parte under the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would provide that a communication is not ex parte if the communication is between a state or regional board staff member acting in his or her official capacity and a state board member, regional board member, or any interested person. The bill would provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if the state or regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to waste discharge requirements, water quality certifications, or conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements, as specified. The bill would also provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if a regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to a municipal separate storm sewer permit, as defined.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/18/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 18, 2012
- Amended 04/30/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 30, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- AB2063 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 8. Page 4924.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 16).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 24).
-
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W., P. & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alejo
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 60 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 10% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 6% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 8% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2063 do?
- Under existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality in the state. The act requires the state board to formulate and adopt state policies for water quality control, and authorizes the state board to hold any hearings and conduct any investigations in any part of the state necessary to carry out the powers vested in the state board, as specified. The act also requires the regional boards to adopt regional water quality control plans in compliance with the state policies. Existing law requires each regional board to conduct certain proceedings, including, but not limited to, holding at least 6 regular meetings each calendar year. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, provides for the conduct of administrative adjudication proceedings of state agencies. Existing law generally prohibits ex parte communication including communication during a pending proceeding, regarding any issue in the proceeding, to the presiding officer by an employee or representative of an agency that is a party to the proceeding without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate, except as specified. This bill would prohibit a state board member, a regional board member, or any interested person, as defined, from engaging in a communication that would be considered ex parte under the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would provide that a communication is not ex parte if the communication is between a state or regional board staff member acting in his or her official capacity and a state board member, regional board member, or any interested person. The bill would provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if the state or regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to waste discharge requirements, water quality certifications, or conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements, as specified. The bill would also provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if a regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to a municipal separate storm sewer permit, as defined.
- Who sponsors AB 2063?
- AB 2063 is sponsored by Alejo.
- What is the current status of AB 2063?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2063?
- Track AB 2063 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2063
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2063
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →