California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1849 — Local government finance: cities: school districts: exchange revenue.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing property tax law generally requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. This bill would, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, authorize a city to elect to exchange amounts of its general funds equal to the city exchange amount, as defined, for the ad valorem property tax revenues of the school districts located within that city. This bill would require the auditor of the county in which a city that makes this election is located to perform specified duties with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues and transfers from the city's general fund to school districts of the city exchange amount. This bill would also require a city that makes this election to report specified information to the auditor in order to assist the auditor in determining the city exchange amount for purposes of making the allocations and transfers specified above. By imposing new duties upon county auditors, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount apportioned to each school district to not include the sum of specified amounts. This bill would include within the sum not apportioned to each school district amounts, if any, received by each school district from a city's general fund as a result of the exchange of revenues described above. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  5. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and ED.

  6. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  7. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Norby · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Norby

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Education.

Failed 2 Yea · 4 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 0200
Unaffiliated 2205
Total 2405
% of votes cast 18%36%0%45%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Nay
Bradford — Nay
Knight — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1849 do?
Existing property tax law generally requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. This bill would, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, authorize a city to elect to exchange amounts of its general funds equal to the city exchange amount, as defined, for the ad valorem property tax revenues of the school districts located within that city. This bill would require the auditor of the county in which a city that makes this election is located to perform specified duties with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues and transfers from the city's general fund to school districts of the city exchange amount. This bill would also require a city that makes this election to report specified information to the auditor in order to assist the auditor in determining the city exchange amount for purposes of making the allocations and transfers specified above. By imposing new duties upon county auditors, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount apportioned to each school district to not include the sum of specified amounts. This bill would include within the sum not apportioned to each school district amounts, if any, received by each school district from a city's general fund as a result of the exchange of revenues described above. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1849?
AB 1849 is sponsored by Norby.
What is the current status of AB 1849?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1849?
Track AB 1849 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1849

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1849

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →