California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1439 — Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

Last action — Died on file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to approve an additional 15 minisatellite wagering sites in each zone under certain conditions, including that no site is within 20 miles of a racetrack, a satellite wagering facility, or a tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility. Existing law provides that if the proposed facility is within 20 miles of one of the above-referenced satellite facilities, then the consent of each facility within a 20-mile radius must be given before the proposed facility may be approved by the board. Existing law requires the written consent of the San Mateo County Fair be obtained prior to the approval of any minisatellite wagering site located within a 20-mile radius of its fairground. This bill would replace the 20-mile radius requirement in the above provisions with a 15-mile requirement and would provide that the requirement that the approval of a racetrack, satellite wagering facility, tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility, or fair be obtained if the proposed minisatellite wagering facility is within 15 miles shall only apply to those facilities that are operated by tribal casinos, racetracks, or fairs that actually conduct 2 weeks or more of live racing in the preceding year. The bill would authorize the board, if a satellite wagering facility or tribal casino does not consent to a minisatellite wagering facility being situated within 15 miles, to conduct a one-year test at the proposed site in order to determine its impact on total parimutuel revenues and on attendance and wagering at existing satellite wagering facilities. With respect to the one-year test, the bill would provide that the board may approve only one minisatellite wagering facility per existing satellite wagering facility and the minisatellite wagering facility shall not be located within 10 miles of the satellite wagering facility. The bill would authorize a certain impact fee, as provided. This bill would specify how mileages are to be measured for purposes of the above provisions. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provisions, prohibit the establishment of a satellite wagering facility or minisatellite wagering facility within 20 miles of a tribal casino. By establishing a prohibition under the Horse Racing Law, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make clarifying and other technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on file.

  2. Placed on inactive file on request of Senator Price.

  3. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3793.)

  4. Reconsideration granted.

  5. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Price.

  6. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 18. Noes 18. Page 3792.)

  7. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3594.)

  9. Set for hearing May 24.

  10. Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. Set for hearing May 17.

  12. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3181.)

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  15. Set for hearing April 13.

  16. To Com. on G.O.

  17. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  18. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Price · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Price

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 19 Yea · 18 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 171702
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 191802
% of votes cast 49%46%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cedillo — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Yea
Runner — Nay
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Nay
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Nay
Dutton — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Alquist — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Nay
Wiggins — Nay
Wolk — Nay
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Nay
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Nay
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Florez — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6302
Total 6302
% of votes cast 55%27%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Wolk — Nay
Alquist — Nay
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Nay
Cox — Yea
Denham — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6004
Democratic 2000
Total 8004
% of votes cast 67%0%0%33%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Wright — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1439 do?
Existing law authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to approve an additional 15 minisatellite wagering sites in each zone under certain conditions, including that no site is within 20 miles of a racetrack, a satellite wagering facility, or a tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility. Existing law provides that if the proposed facility is within 20 miles of one of the above-referenced satellite facilities, then the consent of each facility within a 20-mile radius must be given before the proposed facility may be approved by the board. Existing law requires the written consent of the San Mateo County Fair be obtained prior to the approval of any minisatellite wagering site located within a 20-mile radius of its fairground. This bill would replace the 20-mile radius requirement in the above provisions with a 15-mile requirement and would provide that the requirement that the approval of a racetrack, satellite wagering facility, tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility, or fair be obtained if the proposed minisatellite wagering facility is within 15 miles shall only apply to those facilities that are operated by tribal casinos, racetracks, or fairs that actually conduct 2 weeks or more of live racing in the preceding year. The bill would authorize the board, if a satellite wagering facility or tribal casino does not consent to a minisatellite wagering facility being situated within 15 miles, to conduct a one-year test at the proposed site in order to determine its impact on total parimutuel revenues and on attendance and wagering at existing satellite wagering facilities. With respect to the one-year test, the bill would provide that the board may approve only one minisatellite wagering facility per existing satellite wagering facility and the minisatellite wagering facility shall not be located within 10 miles of the satellite wagering facility. The bill would authorize a certain impact fee, as provided. This bill would specify how mileages are to be measured for purposes of the above provisions. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provisions, prohibit the establishment of a satellite wagering facility or minisatellite wagering facility within 20 miles of a tribal casino. By establishing a prohibition under the Horse Racing Law, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make clarifying and other technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 1439?
SB 1439 is sponsored by Price.
What is the current status of SB 1439?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1439?
Track SB 1439 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1439

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1439

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →