Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1439 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1439.
You're tracking SB 1439
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1439 — Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to approve an additional 15 minisatellite wagering sites in each zone under certain conditions, including that no site is within 20 miles of a racetrack, a satellite wagering facility, or a tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility. Existing law provides that if the proposed facility is within 20 miles of one of the above-referenced satellite facilities, then the consent of each facility within a 20-mile radius must be given before the proposed facility may be approved by the board. Existing law requires the written consent of the San Mateo County Fair be obtained prior to the approval of any minisatellite wagering site located within a 20-mile radius of its fairground. This bill would replace the 20-mile radius requirement in the above provisions with a 15-mile requirement and would provide that the requirement that the approval of a racetrack, satellite wagering facility, tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility, or fair be obtained if the proposed minisatellite wagering facility is within 15 miles shall only apply to those facilities that are operated by tribal casinos, racetracks, or fairs that actually conduct 2 weeks or more of live racing in the preceding year. The bill would authorize the board, if a satellite wagering facility or tribal casino does not consent to a minisatellite wagering facility being situated within 15 miles, to conduct a one-year test at the proposed site in order to determine its impact on total parimutuel revenues and on attendance and wagering at existing satellite wagering facilities. With respect to the one-year test, the bill would provide that the board may approve only one minisatellite wagering facility per existing satellite wagering facility and the minisatellite wagering facility shall not be located within 10 miles of the satellite wagering facility. The bill would authorize a certain impact fee, as provided. This bill would specify how mileages are to be measured for purposes of the above provisions. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provisions, prohibit the establishment of a satellite wagering facility or minisatellite wagering facility within 20 miles of a tribal casino. By establishing a prohibition under the Horse Racing Law, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make clarifying and other technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 28, 2010
- Amended 04/28/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2010
- Amended 04/06/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1439 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Senator Price.
-
(Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3793.)
-
Reconsideration granted.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Price.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 18. Noes 18. Page 3792.)
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3594.)
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 17.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3181.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Price · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Price
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 17 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 18 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 49% | 46% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 27% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1439 do?
- Existing law authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to approve an additional 15 minisatellite wagering sites in each zone under certain conditions, including that no site is within 20 miles of a racetrack, a satellite wagering facility, or a tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility. Existing law provides that if the proposed facility is within 20 miles of one of the above-referenced satellite facilities, then the consent of each facility within a 20-mile radius must be given before the proposed facility may be approved by the board. Existing law requires the written consent of the San Mateo County Fair be obtained prior to the approval of any minisatellite wagering site located within a 20-mile radius of its fairground. This bill would replace the 20-mile radius requirement in the above provisions with a 15-mile requirement and would provide that the requirement that the approval of a racetrack, satellite wagering facility, tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility, or fair be obtained if the proposed minisatellite wagering facility is within 15 miles shall only apply to those facilities that are operated by tribal casinos, racetracks, or fairs that actually conduct 2 weeks or more of live racing in the preceding year. The bill would authorize the board, if a satellite wagering facility or tribal casino does not consent to a minisatellite wagering facility being situated within 15 miles, to conduct a one-year test at the proposed site in order to determine its impact on total parimutuel revenues and on attendance and wagering at existing satellite wagering facilities. With respect to the one-year test, the bill would provide that the board may approve only one minisatellite wagering facility per existing satellite wagering facility and the minisatellite wagering facility shall not be located within 10 miles of the satellite wagering facility. The bill would authorize a certain impact fee, as provided. This bill would specify how mileages are to be measured for purposes of the above provisions. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provisions, prohibit the establishment of a satellite wagering facility or minisatellite wagering facility within 20 miles of a tribal casino. By establishing a prohibition under the Horse Racing Law, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make clarifying and other technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1439?
- SB 1439 is sponsored by Price.
- What is the current status of SB 1439?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1439?
- Track SB 1439 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1439
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1439
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →