SCA 16 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 8.5 to Article II thereof, relating to initiatives.
Last action — Died on file.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The measure would alternatively authorize the electors to propose, and to adopt or reject, statutes and amendments to the Constitution pursuant to a process of initial review by the Legislature. The measure would require that the petition presented to the Secretary of State be certified as signed by electors equal in number to 3% in the case of a statute, or 6% in the case of an amendment to the Constitution, of the votes for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election. The measure would require the Secretary of State to transmit that petition to the Legislature within 10 days. The measure would authorize the Legislature to amend the proposed statute or amendment to the Constitution set forth in the proposed initiative measure. If a proposed statute, with or without change, is enacted, it would go into effect. If the Legislature approves a proposed amendment to the Constitution, with or without change, the amendment would be submitted to the voters for approval. Alternatively, if, by an unspecified date, the Legislature rejects the initiative measure or has taken no action on the initiative measure, the Secretary of State would be required to submit the original initiative measure to the electors for approval if the Secretary of State is presented with an additional petition signed by an additional number of specified electors equal in number to 2% of the votes for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill SCA 16, there has been a change indicating that specific lines of text have been added and others have been removed. While the details of the text itself are not provided here, such edits typically aim to clarify the intent of the law, improve its effectiveness, or address concerns raised during the legislative process. These amendments matter because they can significantly affect how the law will be implemented and understood in practice.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced Current pdf February 27, 2009
- SCA16 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)
-
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 8. Noes 5. Page 2080.)
-
(Suspense - vote only.)
-
Set for hearing August 27.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing July 23.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended.
-
Set for hearing July 20.
-
From committee: Be adopted, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 1632.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing July 7.
-
To Com. on E., R. & C.A.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 31.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- DeSaulnier · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- DeSaulnier
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCA 16 do?
- The measure would alternatively authorize the electors to propose, and to adopt or reject, statutes and amendments to the Constitution pursuant to a process of initial review by the Legislature. The measure would require that the petition presented to the Secretary of State be certified as signed by electors equal in number to 3% in the case of a statute, or 6% in the case of an amendment to the Constitution, of the votes for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election. The measure would require the Secretary of State to transmit that petition to the Legislature within 10 days. The measure would authorize the Legislature to amend the proposed statute or amendment to the Constitution set forth in the proposed initiative measure. If a proposed statute, with or without change, is enacted, it would go into effect. If the Legislature approves a proposed amendment to the Constitution, with or without change, the amendment would be submitted to the voters for approval. Alternatively, if, by an unspecified date, the Legislature rejects the initiative measure or has taken no action on the initiative measure, the Secretary of State would be required to submit the original initiative measure to the electors for approval if the Secretary of State is presented with an additional petition signed by an additional number of specified electors equal in number to 2% of the votes for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election.
- Who sponsors SCA 16?
- SCA 16 is sponsored by DeSaulnier.
- What is the current status of SCA 16?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 16?
- Track SCA 16 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 16
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 16
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →