Medi-Cal: federally qualified health center and rural health center services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1966 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1966.
You're tracking AB 1966
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1966 — Medi-Cal: federally qualified health center and rural health center services.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Existing law provides that federally qualified health center (FQHC) services and rural health clinic (RHC) services, as defined, are covered benefits under the Medi-Cal program, to be reimbursed, to the extent that federal financial participation is obtained, to providers on a per-visit basis. Existing law permits an FQHC or RHC to elect to have pharmacy or dental services reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis, utilizing the current fee schedules established for those services, and provides that the costs shall be adjusted out of the FQHC's and RHC's clinic base rate as scope-of-service changes, as prescribed. This bill would also permit an FQHC or RHC to have inpatient obstetrical and gynecological services reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis as described above. This bill would require the department to seek all necessary federal approvals no later than March 30, 2011.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/17/10 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2010
- AB1966 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 6).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Fletcher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Fletcher
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1966 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Existing law provides that federally qualified health center (FQHC) services and rural health clinic (RHC) services, as defined, are covered benefits under the Medi-Cal program, to be reimbursed, to the extent that federal financial participation is obtained, to providers on a per-visit basis. Existing law permits an FQHC or RHC to elect to have pharmacy or dental services reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis, utilizing the current fee schedules established for those services, and provides that the costs shall be adjusted out of the FQHC's and RHC's clinic base rate as scope-of-service changes, as prescribed. This bill would also permit an FQHC or RHC to have inpatient obstetrical and gynecological services reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis as described above. This bill would require the department to seek all necessary federal approvals no later than March 30, 2011.
- Who sponsors AB 1966?
- AB 1966 is sponsored by Fletcher.
- What is the current status of AB 1966?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1966?
- Track AB 1966 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1966
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1966
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →