California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Introduced

SB 1017 — Sale of goods: breach: damages.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law governs commercial contracts for the sale of goods and specifies damages that a buyer is entitled to recover upon a seller's breach, including incidental and consequential damages. Consequential damages include any loss resulting from requirements and needs of which the seller had reason to know and that could not be prevented by the buyer through obtaining substitute goods, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. This bill would provide that a seller is only liable for consequential damages to a buyer in an action for breach of warranty alleging that a product is defective if the seller is (1) the manufacturer of the product, (2) exercised substantial control over that aspect or aspects of the design, testing, manufacture, packaging, or labeling of the product, (3) altered or modified the product and that action was a substantial factor in causing the harm, or (4) had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect as specified.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of Bill SB 1017, some text has been added, while other text has been removed, but the specific details of those changes aren't provided here. Generally, amendments like these can clarify the bill's intentions, streamline the language, or update information to better reflect current needs. These changes are important because they can affect how the bill functions in practice and ensure it meets the goals it aims to achieve.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. To Com. on JUD.

  3. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  4. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Huff · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Huff

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1017 do?
Existing law governs commercial contracts for the sale of goods and specifies damages that a buyer is entitled to recover upon a seller's breach, including incidental and consequential damages. Consequential damages include any loss resulting from requirements and needs of which the seller had reason to know and that could not be prevented by the buyer through obtaining substitute goods, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. This bill would provide that a seller is only liable for consequential damages to a buyer in an action for breach of warranty alleging that a product is defective if the seller is (1) the manufacturer of the product, (2) exercised substantial control over that aspect or aspects of the design, testing, manufacture, packaging, or labeling of the product, (3) altered or modified the product and that action was a substantial factor in causing the harm, or (4) had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect as specified.
Who sponsors SB 1017?
SB 1017 is sponsored by Huff.
What is the current status of SB 1017?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1017?
Track SB 1017 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1017

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1017

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →