California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 1356 — Counties: homicide trials: reimbursement.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a county that is responsible for the cost of a trial or trials or any hearing of a person for the offense of homicide to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of a portion of the costs incurred by the county in excess of the amount of money derived by the county from a tax of 0.0125 of 1% of the full value of property assessed for purposes of taxation within the county, if the homicide occurred on or after January 1, 2005. This bill would authorize a county, when the victim of a homicide that occurred on or after January 1, 2005, was a peace officer, as specified, to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of the costs incurred by the county, as specified. This bill would also authorize a city in that county to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of investigative costs incurred by the city that are attributable to that trial, trials, or hearing.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 3. Page 3307.)

  3. Set for hearing April 19.

  4. Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)

  5. Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. Set for hearing April 21.

  7. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 3. Page 3103.) Reconsideration granted.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  9. Set for hearing April 7.

  10. To Coms. on L. GOV. and PUB. S.

  11. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  12. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Denham

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety taxation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1356 do?
Existing law authorizes a county that is responsible for the cost of a trial or trials or any hearing of a person for the offense of homicide to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of a portion of the costs incurred by the county in excess of the amount of money derived by the county from a tax of 0.0125 of 1% of the full value of property assessed for purposes of taxation within the county, if the homicide occurred on or after January 1, 2005. This bill would authorize a county, when the victim of a homicide that occurred on or after January 1, 2005, was a peace officer, as specified, to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of the costs incurred by the county, as specified. This bill would also authorize a city in that county to apply to the Controller for reimbursement of investigative costs incurred by the city that are attributable to that trial, trials, or hearing.
Who sponsors SB 1356?
SB 1356 is sponsored by Cogdill, Denham, Galgiani, and Bill Berryhill.
What is the current status of SB 1356?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1356?
Track SB 1356 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1356

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1356

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →