California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1682 — Police reports: confidential personal information.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law prohibits any law enforcement officer or employee of a law enforcement agency from disclosing to any arrested person, or to any person who may be a defendant in a criminal action, the address or telephone number of any person who is a victim or witness of the alleged offense. This bill would authorize a board of supervisors or a city council to authorize the sheriff, in the case of a county, or the chief of police, in the case of a city, to establish a procedure to protect current address information contained in a police report, arrest report, or investigative report regarding a victim if access to that information would reveal the current address of a victim or alleged victim of a crime, and if that victim, alleged victim, or the parent or guardian of a victim or alleged victim who is a minor has requested the information to be kept confidential, subject to specified exceptions. (2) The California Public Records Act requires public records to be open to inspection by the public except as specifically exempted from disclosure. The act requires, subject to certain exceptions, state and local law enforcement agencies to provide the current address of every individual arrested by the agency and the current address of the victim of a crime, where the requester declares under penalty of perjury that the request is made for scholarly, journalistic, political, or governmental purpose, or that the request is made for investigation by a private investigator as specified. This bill would instead provide that these provisions are subject to any procedures adopted by a sheriff or chief of police to keep confidential current address information contained in certain reports relating to a victim or alleged victim of a crime.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  5. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  6. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4777.)

  7. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 21).

  8. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended.

  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  11. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Torres · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Torres

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Failed 2 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2500
Total 2500
% of votes cast 29%71%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Portantino — Nay
Gilmore — Yea
Hill — Nay
Ammiano — Nay
Beall — Nay
Skinner — Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Failed 2 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2500
Total 2500
% of votes cast 29%71%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Gilmore — Yea
Portantino — Nay
Hagman — Yea
Beall — Nay
Hill — Nay
Skinner — Nay
Ammiano — Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety.

Passed 23 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22002
Democratic 1000
Total 23002
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (25)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Charles — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Silva — Yea
Tran — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1682 do?
(1) Existing law prohibits any law enforcement officer or employee of a law enforcement agency from disclosing to any arrested person, or to any person who may be a defendant in a criminal action, the address or telephone number of any person who is a victim or witness of the alleged offense. This bill would authorize a board of supervisors or a city council to authorize the sheriff, in the case of a county, or the chief of police, in the case of a city, to establish a procedure to protect current address information contained in a police report, arrest report, or investigative report regarding a victim if access to that information would reveal the current address of a victim or alleged victim of a crime, and if that victim, alleged victim, or the parent or guardian of a victim or alleged victim who is a minor has requested the information to be kept confidential, subject to specified exceptions. (2) The California Public Records Act requires public records to be open to inspection by the public except as specifically exempted from disclosure. The act requires, subject to certain exceptions, state and local law enforcement agencies to provide the current address of every individual arrested by the agency and the current address of the victim of a crime, where the requester declares under penalty of perjury that the request is made for scholarly, journalistic, political, or governmental purpose, or that the request is made for investigation by a private investigator as specified. This bill would instead provide that these provisions are subject to any procedures adopted by a sheriff or chief of police to keep confidential current address information contained in certain reports relating to a victim or alleged victim of a crime.
Who sponsors AB 1682?
AB 1682 is sponsored by Torres.
What is the current status of AB 1682?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1682?
Track AB 1682 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1682

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1682

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →