California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1042 — Local government: school siting and improvement.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district to comply with any city or county ordinance regulating drainage improvements and conditions, regulating road improvements or conditions, or requiring the review and approval of grading plans as these ordinance provisions relate to the design and construction of onsite improvements which affect drainage, road conditions, or grading. This bill would instead require the governing board of a school district to comply with any city or county ordinance regulating drainage improvements and conditions, regulating road improvements or conditions, requiring the review or approval of grading plans, or requiring sidewalk improvements as these ordinance provisions relate to the design and construction of onsite improvements which affect drainage, road conditions, grading, or pedestrian access. (2) Existing law authorizes the governing board of an elementary, high school, or unified school district, following notification by a local planning agency of a proposed action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, to request a meeting with the planning agency to discuss possible methods of coordinating planning, design, and construction of new school facilities and schoolsites in coordination with the existing or planned infrastructure, general plan, and zoning designations of the city and county, as specified. Existing law requires the planning agency to meet with the school district within 15 days following the notification if a meeting is requested by the school district. The bill would instead require the governing board of an elementary, high school, or unified school district, following notification by a local planning agency of a proposed action to adopt or substantially amend its general plan, to request a meeting with the planning agency to discuss possible methods of coordinating planning, design, and construction of new school facilities and schoolsites in coordination with the existing or planned infrastructure, general plan, and zoning designations of the city and county, as specified. The bill would require the planning agency to meet with the school district within 15 days following the notification by the planning agency without regard to whether a meeting was requested by the school district. By adding to the duties of school district and local planning agency officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, at least 45 days prior to completion of a school facility needs analysis, a master plan, or other long-range plan that relates to the potential expansion of existing schoolsites or the necessity to acquire additional schoolsites, to notify the planning commission or agency of the city or county with land use jurisdiction within the school district and to provide copies of any relevant and available information, master plan, or other long-range plan that relates to the potential expansion of school schoolsites or the necessity to acquire additional schoolsites. Existing law authorizes the affected city or county to request a meeting, as specified, with the school district, and requires the school district to meet with the city or county within 15 days following the notification by the school district if a meeting is requested. The bill would instead require the affected city, county, or city and county to request a meeting with the school district, as specified, following the notification by the school district. The bill would require the school district to meet with the city, county, or city and county within 15 days following the notification by the school district without regard to whether a meeting was requested by the city, county, or city and county. By adding to the duties of school district and city, county, or city and county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  5. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and ED.

  6. Read first time.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  8. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Carter · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Carter

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety housing education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1042 do?
(1) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district to comply with any city or county ordinance regulating drainage improvements and conditions, regulating road improvements or conditions, or requiring the review and approval of grading plans as these ordinance provisions relate to the design and construction of onsite improvements which affect drainage, road conditions, or grading. This bill would instead require the governing board of a school district to comply with any city or county ordinance regulating drainage improvements and conditions, regulating road improvements or conditions, requiring the review or approval of grading plans, or requiring sidewalk improvements as these ordinance provisions relate to the design and construction of onsite improvements which affect drainage, road conditions, grading, or pedestrian access. (2) Existing law authorizes the governing board of an elementary, high school, or unified school district, following notification by a local planning agency of a proposed action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, to request a meeting with the planning agency to discuss possible methods of coordinating planning, design, and construction of new school facilities and schoolsites in coordination with the existing or planned infrastructure, general plan, and zoning designations of the city and county, as specified. Existing law requires the planning agency to meet with the school district within 15 days following the notification if a meeting is requested by the school district. The bill would instead require the governing board of an elementary, high school, or unified school district, following notification by a local planning agency of a proposed action to adopt or substantially amend its general plan, to request a meeting with the planning agency to discuss possible methods of coordinating planning, design, and construction of new school facilities and schoolsites in coordination with the existing or planned infrastructure, general plan, and zoning designations of the city and county, as specified. The bill would require the planning agency to meet with the school district within 15 days following the notification by the planning agency without regard to whether a meeting was requested by the school district. By adding to the duties of school district and local planning agency officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, at least 45 days prior to completion of a school facility needs analysis, a master plan, or other long-range plan that relates to the potential expansion of existing schoolsites or the necessity to acquire additional schoolsites, to notify the planning commission or agency of the city or county with land use jurisdiction within the school district and to provide copies of any relevant and available information, master plan, or other long-range plan that relates to the potential expansion of school schoolsites or the necessity to acquire additional schoolsites. Existing law authorizes the affected city or county to request a meeting, as specified, with the school district, and requires the school district to meet with the city or county within 15 days following the notification by the school district if a meeting is requested. The bill would instead require the affected city, county, or city and county to request a meeting with the school district, as specified, following the notification by the school district. The bill would require the school district to meet with the city, county, or city and county within 15 days following the notification by the school district without regard to whether a meeting was requested by the city, county, or city and county. By adding to the duties of school district and city, county, or city and county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1042?
AB 1042 is sponsored by Carter.
What is the current status of AB 1042?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1042?
Track AB 1042 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1042

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1042

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →