Chemicals of concern: flame retardants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1291 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1291.
You're tracking SB 1291
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1291 — Chemicals of concern: flame retardants.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals or chemical ingredients in products may be identified and prioritized for consideration as being chemicals of concern and to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals of concern may be evaluated. The regulations are required to specify actions that the department may take following the completion of the analysis. A violation of the hazardous waste control law is a crime. Existing law, the Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act, administered by the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation, imposes specified flame retardant requirements. This bill would require the department to include, as a chemical under consideration as being a chemical of concern, any chemical that is used, or is proposed to be used, as a flame retardant, as defined, in accordance with those regulations and the review process established by the department. The bill would prohibit a person from using a new flame retardant in the manufacture of, or otherwise in connection with, any upholstered furniture, bedding and filling materials, until the department has considered and determined whether the new flame retardant is a chemical of concern. The bill would require the department and the bureau, in consultation with any other state agencies and interdepartmental workgroups, to jointly evaluate the current technical bulletins issued by the bureau and determine whether appropriate changes to those bulletins are warranted. The bill would require a person to use a flame retardant in accordance with the regulatory responses adopted by the department. By creating new prohibitions, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/01/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 01, 2010
- Amended 04/22/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2010
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1291 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Senator Leno.
-
(Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3795.)
-
Reconsideration granted.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Leno.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 20. Noes 13. Page 3795.)
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3674.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 27.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3300.)
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Leno · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leno
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 14 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 51% | 36% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1291 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals or chemical ingredients in products may be identified and prioritized for consideration as being chemicals of concern and to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals of concern may be evaluated. The regulations are required to specify actions that the department may take following the completion of the analysis. A violation of the hazardous waste control law is a crime. Existing law, the Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act, administered by the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation, imposes specified flame retardant requirements. This bill would require the department to include, as a chemical under consideration as being a chemical of concern, any chemical that is used, or is proposed to be used, as a flame retardant, as defined, in accordance with those regulations and the review process established by the department. The bill would prohibit a person from using a new flame retardant in the manufacture of, or otherwise in connection with, any upholstered furniture, bedding and filling materials, until the department has considered and determined whether the new flame retardant is a chemical of concern. The bill would require the department and the bureau, in consultation with any other state agencies and interdepartmental workgroups, to jointly evaluate the current technical bulletins issued by the bureau and determine whether appropriate changes to those bulletins are warranted. The bill would require a person to use a flame retardant in accordance with the regulatory responses adopted by the department. By creating new prohibitions, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1291?
- SB 1291 is sponsored by Leno.
- What is the current status of SB 1291?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1291?
- Track SB 1291 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1291
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1291
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →