Voter identification: proof of identity.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 465 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 465.
You're tracking SB 465
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 465 — Voter identification: proof of identity.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a person desiring to vote at a polling place to announce his or her name and address to a precinct board member and to write this information on the roster of voters. This bill would also require the person to present proof of his or her identity to a member of the precinct board before receiving a ballot. The bill would require the proof of identity to contain the person's name and photograph, to be either unexpired or expired after the last general election, and to be issued by the United States, the State of California, or a tribal government. The bill would permit a voter who is unable to present proof of identity to cast a provisional ballot and would require the voter to provide identification to the county registrar of voters within 5 business days of voting. The bill, by requiring county elections officials to perform new duties, would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 12/17/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf December 17, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- SB465 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
-
Set for hearing January 5.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
To Com. on E., R. & C.A.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Aanestad · Cosponsor
- Ashburn · Cosponsor
- Benoit · Cosponsor
- Cox · Cosponsor
- DeVore · Cosponsor
- Dutton · Cosponsor
- Gilmore · Cosponsor
- Hollingsworth · Cosponsor
- Huff · Primary
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Knight · Cosponsor
- Beth Gaines · Cosponsor
- Nestande · Cosponsor
- Silva · Cosponsor
- Smyth · Cosponsor
- Roger W. Niello · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Huff
Co-sponsors (15)
- Aanestad
- Ashburn
- Benoit
- Cox
- DeVore
- Dutton
- Gilmore
- Hollingsworth
- Jeffries
- Knight
- Beth Gaines
- Nestande
- Silva
- Smyth
- Niello, Roger W. Republican
Not signed on (106)
106 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 106 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 40% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 465 do?
- Existing law requires a person desiring to vote at a polling place to announce his or her name and address to a precinct board member and to write this information on the roster of voters. This bill would also require the person to present proof of his or her identity to a member of the precinct board before receiving a ballot. The bill would require the proof of identity to contain the person's name and photograph, to be either unexpired or expired after the last general election, and to be issued by the United States, the State of California, or a tribal government. The bill would permit a voter who is unable to present proof of identity to cast a provisional ballot and would require the voter to provide identification to the county registrar of voters within 5 business days of voting. The bill, by requiring county elections officials to perform new duties, would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 465?
- SB 465 is sponsored by Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cox, DeVore, Dutton, Gilmore, Hollingsworth, Huff, Jeffries, Knight, Beth Gaines, Nestande, Silva, Smyth, and Niello, Roger W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 465?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 465?
- Track SB 465 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 465
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 465
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →