California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 453 — Gasoline: vapor recovery systems.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt procedures for determining the compliance of any system designed for the control of gasoline vapor emissions during gasoline marketing operations, including storage and transfer operations, and additional performance standards to ensure that systems for the control of gasoline vapors from motor vehicle fueling operations do not cause excessive spillage and emissions. Existing law prohibits the state board from requiring a gasoline dispensing facility that meets certain requirements from undergoing an Enhanced Vapor Recovery Phase II upgrade until April 1, 2011. This bill, except as specified, would limit the fines imposed on a gasoline dispensing facility that fails to meet an April 1, 2009, compliance deadline to a total of no more than $1,000 for all violations that occur between April 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009, if the gasoline dispensing facility meets specified requirements. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended.

  6. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (May 4).

  7. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  8. Read second time and amended.

  9. From committee: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27).

  10. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  16. Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  17. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Adams · Cosponsor
  • Anderson · Cosponsor
  • Blakeslee · Cosponsor
  • Caballero · Cosponsor
  • Fletcher · Cosponsor
  • Portantino · Cosponsor
  • Audra Strickland · Cosponsor
  • Cook · Cosponsor
  • Conway · Cosponsor
  • Coto · Cosponsor
  • Cox · Cosponsor
  • DeVore · Cosponsor
  • Duvall · Cosponsor
  • Emmerson · Cosponsor
  • Fuller · Cosponsor
  • Beth Gaines · Cosponsor
  • Galgiani · Cosponsor
  • Hagman · Cosponsor
  • Garrick · Primary
  • Gilmore · Cosponsor
  • Harkey · Cosponsor
  • Huber · Cosponsor
  • Jeffries · Cosponsor
  • Knight · Cosponsor
  • Logue · Cosponsor
  • Mendoza · Cosponsor
  • Miller · Cosponsor
  • Nestande · Cosponsor
  • Nielsen · Cosponsor
  • Niello · Cosponsor
  • Silva · Cosponsor
  • Smyth · Cosponsor
  • Solorio · Cosponsor
  • Swanson · Cosponsor
  • Tran · Cosponsor
  • Villines · Cosponsor
  • Joaquin Arambula · Cosponsor
  • Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor
  • Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 83 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Garrick

Co-sponsors (38)

  • Adams
  • Anderson
  • Blakeslee
  • Caballero
  • Fletcher
  • Portantino
  • Audra Strickland
  • Cook
  • Conway
  • Coto
  • Cox
  • DeVore
  • Duvall
  • Emmerson
  • Fuller
  • Beth Gaines
  • Galgiani
  • Hagman
  • Gilmore
  • Harkey
  • Huber
  • Jeffries
  • Knight
  • Logue
  • Mendoza
  • Miller
  • Nestande
  • Nielsen
  • Niello
  • Silva
  • Smyth
  • Solorio
  • Swanson
  • Tran
  • Villines
  • Arambula, Joaquin Democratic
  • Bill Berryhill
  • Bill Berryhill

Not signed on (83)

83 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 83 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Knight — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 453 do?
Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt procedures for determining the compliance of any system designed for the control of gasoline vapor emissions during gasoline marketing operations, including storage and transfer operations, and additional performance standards to ensure that systems for the control of gasoline vapors from motor vehicle fueling operations do not cause excessive spillage and emissions. Existing law prohibits the state board from requiring a gasoline dispensing facility that meets certain requirements from undergoing an Enhanced Vapor Recovery Phase II upgrade until April 1, 2011. This bill, except as specified, would limit the fines imposed on a gasoline dispensing facility that fails to meet an April 1, 2009, compliance deadline to a total of no more than $1,000 for all violations that occur between April 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009, if the gasoline dispensing facility meets specified requirements. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 453?
AB 453 is sponsored by Adams, Anderson, Blakeslee, Caballero, Fletcher, Portantino, Audra Strickland, Cook, Conway, Coto, Cox, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fuller, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Hagman, Garrick, Gilmore, Harkey, Huber, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Mendoza, Miller, Nestande, Nielsen, Niello, Silva, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Tran, Villines, Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic), and Bill Berryhill.
What is the current status of AB 453?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 453?
Track AB 453 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 453

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 453

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →