AB 71 — Categorical education funding: block grants.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law established the pupil retention block grant, school safety consolidated competitive grant, teacher credentialing block grant, professional development block grant, a new targeted instructional improvement block grant, and school library improvement block grant. Existing law authorizes a school district or county office of education to expend in a fiscal year up to 15% of the amount apportioned for the school safety consolidated competitive grant, professional development block grant, targeted instructional improvement block grant, or school library improvement block grant for any other programs for which the school district or county office is eligible for funding, not to exceed 120% of the amount of state funding allocated in a fiscal year to the school district or county office for purposes of the program to which funds are transferred. This bill would repeal those block grants and instead establish the following block grants, composed of funding for specified categorical education programs: the Supplemental Professional and Staff Development Block Grant, the Supplemental Academic Support for At-Risk Pupils Block Grant, the Supplemental Academic Support Block Grant, the Supplemental Operational Support Block Grant, the Supplemental Career Technical Education Block Grant, and the Supplemental Pupil Support Block Grant. Commencing with the 2009–10 fiscal year, the Superintendent of Public Instruction would be required to apportion funds from those block grants to school districts, as defined. The bill would authorize a school district or county office of education to expend in a fiscal year up to 50% of the amount apportioned for the block grants established by the bill for any other categorical program for which the school district or county office is eligible for funding, including programs whose funding is not included in any of the block grants established by the bill, not to exceed 155% of the amount of state funding allocated in a fiscal year to the school district or county office for purposes of the program to which funds are transferred. The bill also would repeal statutory provisions that established or are related to various programs included in the block grants established by the bill. (2) Existing law specifies the formula that the Superintendent of Public Instruction is required to use in order to calculate a categorical block grant for charter schools. Existing law authorizes charter schools that elect to receive their funding directly to apply individually for federal and state categorical programs, except as specified, to the extent that they are eligible for funding and meet the provisions of the programs. This bill would repeal those provisions and instead require the Superintendent to calculate a categorical block grant for charter schools using a formula based on the supplemental block grants established by the bill as described in (1) above. The bill also would prohibit charter schools from separately applying for funding pursuant to any of the categorical programs included in the supplemental block grants. This bill would make an appropriation by allowing funds that are continuously appropriated for purposes of the After School Education and Safety Program to be used for other categorical purposes.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 12/12/08 - Introduced Current pdf December 12, 2008
- AB71 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 14.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Duvall · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Duvall
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 71 do?
- (1) Existing law established the pupil retention block grant, school safety consolidated competitive grant, teacher credentialing block grant, professional development block grant, a new targeted instructional improvement block grant, and school library improvement block grant. Existing law authorizes a school district or county office of education to expend in a fiscal year up to 15% of the amount apportioned for the school safety consolidated competitive grant, professional development block grant, targeted instructional improvement block grant, or school library improvement block grant for any other programs for which the school district or county office is eligible for funding, not to exceed 120% of the amount of state funding allocated in a fiscal year to the school district or county office for purposes of the program to which funds are transferred. This bill would repeal those block grants and instead establish the following block grants, composed of funding for specified categorical education programs: the Supplemental Professional and Staff Development Block Grant, the Supplemental Academic Support for At-Risk Pupils Block Grant, the Supplemental Academic Support Block Grant, the Supplemental Operational Support Block Grant, the Supplemental Career Technical Education Block Grant, and the Supplemental Pupil Support Block Grant. Commencing with the 2009–10 fiscal year, the Superintendent of Public Instruction would be required to apportion funds from those block grants to school districts, as defined. The bill would authorize a school district or county office of education to expend in a fiscal year up to 50% of the amount apportioned for the block grants established by the bill for any other categorical program for which the school district or county office is eligible for funding, including programs whose funding is not included in any of the block grants established by the bill, not to exceed 155% of the amount of state funding allocated in a fiscal year to the school district or county office for purposes of the program to which funds are transferred. The bill also would repeal statutory provisions that established or are related to various programs included in the block grants established by the bill. (2) Existing law specifies the formula that the Superintendent of Public Instruction is required to use in order to calculate a categorical block grant for charter schools. Existing law authorizes charter schools that elect to receive their funding directly to apply individually for federal and state categorical programs, except as specified, to the extent that they are eligible for funding and meet the provisions of the programs. This bill would repeal those provisions and instead require the Superintendent to calculate a categorical block grant for charter schools using a formula based on the supplemental block grants established by the bill as described in (1) above. The bill also would prohibit charter schools from separately applying for funding pursuant to any of the categorical programs included in the supplemental block grants. This bill would make an appropriation by allowing funds that are continuously appropriated for purposes of the After School Education and Safety Program to be used for other categorical purposes.
- Who sponsors AB 71?
- AB 71 is sponsored by Duvall.
- What is the current status of AB 71?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 71?
- Track AB 71 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 71
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 71
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →