California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2473 — Capital area planning.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Capitol Area Plan as the official state master plan for development in the central city of the City of Sacramento, and requires that it be a guide for future state policy in the expansion of the state's physical plant and in the locating of state buildings and other facilities in the metropolitan area. Existing law defines metropolitan area for this purpose as the greater metropolitan Sacramento area, including the City of Sacramento, the County of Sacramento, and the eastern part of Yolo County. Existing law requires the Department of General Services to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and each member of the Legislature annually, summarizing various actions in connection with the Capitol Area Plan. This bill would require the Department of General Services to request, and the Controller to provide, specified aggregated demographic information on employees of state agencies in the metropolitan area of and in each incorporated city in, Sacramento County. This bill would require this information be reported to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and each Member of the Legislature, as described above.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  5. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (April 6).

  6. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  7. Read first time.

  8. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  9. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Huber · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Huber

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2473 do?
Existing law establishes the Capitol Area Plan as the official state master plan for development in the central city of the City of Sacramento, and requires that it be a guide for future state policy in the expansion of the state's physical plant and in the locating of state buildings and other facilities in the metropolitan area. Existing law defines metropolitan area for this purpose as the greater metropolitan Sacramento area, including the City of Sacramento, the County of Sacramento, and the eastern part of Yolo County. Existing law requires the Department of General Services to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and each member of the Legislature annually, summarizing various actions in connection with the Capitol Area Plan. This bill would require the Department of General Services to request, and the Controller to provide, specified aggregated demographic information on employees of state agencies in the metropolitan area of and in each incorporated city in, Sacramento County. This bill would require this information be reported to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and each Member of the Legislature, as described above.
Who sponsors AB 2473?
AB 2473 is sponsored by Huber.
What is the current status of AB 2473?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2473?
Track AB 2473 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2473

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2473

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →