Income tax: overpayments: interest.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 137 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 137.
You're tracking SB 137
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 137 — Income tax: overpayments: interest.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing income and corporation tax laws require the payment of interest on overpayments of tax, except that no interest is required if the overpayments are refunded or credited within specified 90-day time periods. This bill would provide that, in the case of any individual taxable under the Personal Income Tax Law, in the circumstance in which the Controller makes a specified determination, interest shall be allowed and paid on refund warrants that are delayed, as provided. This bill would make a legislative finding and declaration regarding the public purpose served by the bill.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/27/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 27, 2009
- Amended 03/31/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 31, 2009
- Introduced 02/10/09 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2009
- SB137 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 638.)
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Maldonado · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Maldonado
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 137 do?
- Existing income and corporation tax laws require the payment of interest on overpayments of tax, except that no interest is required if the overpayments are refunded or credited within specified 90-day time periods. This bill would provide that, in the case of any individual taxable under the Personal Income Tax Law, in the circumstance in which the Controller makes a specified determination, interest shall be allowed and paid on refund warrants that are delayed, as provided. This bill would make a legislative finding and declaration regarding the public purpose served by the bill.
- Who sponsors SB 137?
- SB 137 is sponsored by Maldonado.
- What is the current status of SB 137?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 137?
- Track SB 137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 137
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 137
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →