California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2353 — Conservancies: reporting requirements.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes various conservancies to acquire, manage, direct the management of, and conserve public lands in the state. Existing law requires the State Coastal Conservancy, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, and the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, to submit a report, at specified times, to the Legislature. This bill would require the California Tahoe Conservancy, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy, the San Joaquin River Conservancy, the Baldwin Hills Conservancy, the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, the San Diego River Conservancy, and the Coachella Valley Mountain Conservancy to submit biennial reports to the Legislature and to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency detailing their funding, land management costs, administrative costs, and a description of, and the amount of money expended for, all projects funded by the conservancy, a project schedule, and progress toward achieving specified purposes, among other things. The bill would also conform the dates for submitting the reports to when the existing reports are required to be submitted by the State Coastal Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, and the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. (2) Existing law requires the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy to transmit to the Governor and the Legislature a 2-part report with specified information, including, among other things, information in the 2nd part of the report regarding the disposition of the funds appropriated to the conservancy in the fiscal year preceding the year in which the report was made. This bill would instead require the 2nd part of the report to include information regarding the disposition of the funds appropriated to the conservancy in the 2 fiscal years preceding the year in which the report was made, among other things, including, but not limited to, information on state and nonstate funding sources.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended.

  6. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 19).

  7. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  12. Read first time.

  13. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  14. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Logue · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Logue

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2353 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes various conservancies to acquire, manage, direct the management of, and conserve public lands in the state. Existing law requires the State Coastal Conservancy, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, and the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, to submit a report, at specified times, to the Legislature. This bill would require the California Tahoe Conservancy, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy, the San Joaquin River Conservancy, the Baldwin Hills Conservancy, the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, the San Diego River Conservancy, and the Coachella Valley Mountain Conservancy to submit biennial reports to the Legislature and to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency detailing their funding, land management costs, administrative costs, and a description of, and the amount of money expended for, all projects funded by the conservancy, a project schedule, and progress toward achieving specified purposes, among other things. The bill would also conform the dates for submitting the reports to when the existing reports are required to be submitted by the State Coastal Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, and the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. (2) Existing law requires the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy to transmit to the Governor and the Legislature a 2-part report with specified information, including, among other things, information in the 2nd part of the report regarding the disposition of the funds appropriated to the conservancy in the fiscal year preceding the year in which the report was made. This bill would instead require the 2nd part of the report to include information regarding the disposition of the funds appropriated to the conservancy in the 2 fiscal years preceding the year in which the report was made, among other things, including, but not limited to, information on state and nonstate funding sources.
Who sponsors AB 2353?
AB 2353 is sponsored by Logue.
What is the current status of AB 2353?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2353?
Track AB 2353 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2353

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2353

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →