Elections: vote by mail ballots.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1367 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1367.
You're tracking AB 1367
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1367 — Elections: vote by mail ballots.
Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires that a vote by mail ballot be received by the issuing elections official or the precinct board no later than the close of polls on election day. This bill would make an exception for special absentee voters, as defined, temporarily living outside of the territorial limits of the United States or the District of Columbia and would instead require that their vote by mail ballot be postmarked or signed and dated by the voter on or before election day and received by their elections official not later than 21 days after election day. Because the bill would impose additional duties on elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 28, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1367 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Fletcher · Primary
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Cook · Cosponsor
- DeVore · Cosponsor
- Gilmore · Cosponsor
- Knight · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Fletcher
Co-sponsors (5)
- Runner
- Cook
- DeVore
- Gilmore
- Knight
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 38% | 57% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Nay |
| De | — | Nay |
| Leon | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1367 do?
- Existing law requires that a vote by mail ballot be received by the issuing elections official or the precinct board no later than the close of polls on election day. This bill would make an exception for special absentee voters, as defined, temporarily living outside of the territorial limits of the United States or the District of Columbia and would instead require that their vote by mail ballot be postmarked or signed and dated by the voter on or before election day and received by their elections official not later than 21 days after election day. Because the bill would impose additional duties on elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1367?
- AB 1367 is sponsored by Fletcher, Runner, Cook, DeVore, Gilmore, and Knight.
- What is the current status of AB 1367?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1367?
- Track AB 1367 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1367
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1367
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →